<![CDATA[Could a film entitled 'Anaconda' have been any better than this?]]>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Anaconda

Jacovitti86 — 11 years ago(February 15, 2015 04:51 AM)

I don't think so. I don't see how people could expect anything better. It's fun for what it is, silly dumb entertainment. And the snake actually looks scary in many shots.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/222563/could-a-film-entitled-anaconda-have-been-any-better-than-thisRSS for NodeSat, 16 May 2026 03:52:10 GMTSat, 02 May 2026 14:51:11 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to Could a film entitled 'Anaconda' have been any better than this? on Sat, 02 May 2026 14:51:14 GMT]]>Jeorj Euler — 9 years ago(January 29, 2017 01:35 AM)

Jaws worked. So did The Birds. A movie doesn't have to suck just because it's about killer animals.
True. This movie is kind of off-putting mainly because of the acting, possibly the plot as well. Of course, it doesn't help that the CGI didn't age too well. The practical effects were excellent.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1867010https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1867010Sat, 02 May 2026 14:51:14 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Could a film entitled 'Anaconda' have been any better than this? on Sat, 02 May 2026 14:51:13 GMT]]>Zoyer — 10 years ago(September 03, 2015 06:26 PM)

Jaws worked. So did The Birds. A movie doesn't have to suck just because it's about killer animals.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1867009https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1867009Sat, 02 May 2026 14:51:13 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Could a film entitled 'Anaconda' have been any better than this? on Sat, 02 May 2026 14:51:12 GMT]]>kfckid-365-296572 — 11 years ago(March 13, 2015 01:38 PM)

Yeah, a better story, better effects, actors who didn't just 'phone' it in
'When you hang a man, you better look at him.'

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1867008https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1867008Sat, 02 May 2026 14:51:12 GMT