<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[I was allowed to watch ANYTHING growing up, except this…]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Hush</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>bexbraddock69</strong> — <em>16 years ago(December 30, 2009 06:23 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I'm 20 now but I wonder why I wasn't allowed to watch this movie.<br />
[spoiler]Lindsay Lohan Fan [/spoiler]</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/222692/i-was-allowed-to-watch-anything-growing-up-except-this</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 May 2026 18:50:05 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/222692.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 15:03:41 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to I was allowed to watch ANYTHING growing up, except this… on Sat, 02 May 2026 15:03:43 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>bexbraddock69</strong> — <em>15 years ago(July 17, 2010 12:11 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Thank you! <img src="https://filmglance.com/discuss/assets/plugins/nodebb-plugin-emoji/emoji/android/1f642.png?v=8570fb93240" class="not-responsive emoji emoji-android emoji--slightly_smiling_face" style="height:23px;width:auto;vertical-align:middle" title=":)" alt="🙂" /><br />
[spoiler]Lindsay Lohan Fan [/spoiler]</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1867674</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1867674</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 15:03:43 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to I was allowed to watch ANYTHING growing up, except this… on Sat, 02 May 2026 15:03:42 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>HenryCW</strong> — <em>16 years ago(March 17, 2010 12:55 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I beiieve that was because while there was little sex or violence in the film, it actually dealt with rather serious family issues that children might not be able to understand or interpret correctly. In suggesting this, I am not necessarily in agreement with your parents.<br />
You don't have to be a psychology major to know that both the man and her mother got issues. The man was obviously a mama's boy who had an unhealthy attachment to his mother, and dared not confront her on any matter - except at the very end. Little need to be said for the mother, who was obviously a psycho case. She had to be in control of everything. In particular, she had to be in complete possession of her son. She was afraid of losing him to "the competition" - meaning his wife. She regarded the wife just as an instrument to generate an heir for the the family - just like breeding horses, you know? After that, she wanted her dead.<br />
This film is highly unlikely to improve people's relations with their mothers and in-laws.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1867673</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1867673</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 15:03:42 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>