<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Everything was true in the film and the entertainment value of this movie was out of sight. Part 2 would have been very]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — FairyTale: A True Story</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>Dave1136</strong> — <em>9 years ago(September 17, 2016 01:47 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Everything was true in the film and the entertainment value of this movie was out of sight. Part 2 would have been very interesting- Read Roger Ebert's column about this film:  <a href="http://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/fairytale-a-true-story-1997" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/fairytale-a-true-story-1997</a></p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/222921/everything-was-true-in-the-film-and-the-entertainment-value-of-this-movie-was-out-of-sight-part-2-would-have-been-very</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Sun, 17 May 2026 14:24:08 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/222921.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 15:42:16 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl></channel></rss>