<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.cottingleyconnect.org.uk&#x2F;girlfairy.htm]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — FairyTale: A True Story</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>tracy3185</strong> — <em>20 years ago(March 24, 2006 01:11 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto"><a href="http://www.cottingleyconnect.org.uk/girlfairy.htm" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.cottingleyconnect.org.uk/girlfairy.htm</a><br />
<a href="http://www.cottingleyconnect.org.uk/fairy.htm" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.cottingleyconnect.org.uk/fairy.htm</a><br />
<a href="http://www.cottingleyconnect.org.uk/gnome.htm" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.cottingleyconnect.org.uk/gnome.htm</a><br />
<a href="http://www.cottingleyconnect.org.uk/fairs.htm" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.cottingleyconnect.org.uk/fairs.htm</a><br />
<a href="http://www.cottingleyconnect.org.uk/sunbath.htm" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.cottingleyconnect.org.uk/sunbath.htm</a><br />
***This site has quite a bit of info on the whole situation.<br />
<a href="http://www.cottingleyconnect.org.uk/fairies.htm#photos" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.cottingleyconnect.org.uk/fairies.htm#photos</a></p>
<pre><code class="language-Here">The Story
In 1916/17 Frances Griffiths and Elsie Wright, two young girls living in Cottingley, produced the most famous fairy pictures in Britain which are still talked about today.
The first photograph was taken in July 1917 and showed Frances with the fairies.
Frances and Elsie had been teased about their story of seeing fairies near Cottingley Beck. Elsie borrowed her father's quarter plate camera ,which he set to 1/50s at f/11 for her, and after some rudimentary instruction on how to operate it, she went off with Frances into the area where the beck ran among the trees behind the family home. An hour later they returned triumphant.
When Mr. Arthur Wright (one of the earliest qualified electrical engineers), and Elsie went into the dark room that evening to develop the plate, there were the fairies. Arthur asked what those bits of paper were doing on the picture?
The second photograph of the gnome resulted in the girls being banned from borrowing the camera again. The photographs were put away by Mr. Wright in a drawer as he considered them to be pranks. (Mrs. Wright was convinced of their authenticity.)
In 1918 Frances wrote to her friend Johanna Parvin in South Africa and enclosed a copy of the photograph. On the back of the photo she had written 'Elsie and I are friendly with the beck fairies. Funny, I never used to see them in Africa. It must be too hot for them there. The letter from Frances ran thus: '. . . all think the war will be over in a few days, we are going to get our flags to hang up in our bedroom. I am sending you two photos, both of me, one is me in a bathing costume in our back yard, uncle Arthur took that, while the other is me with some fairies up the beck, Elsie took that one. Rosebud is as fat as ever and I have made her some new clothes. How are Teddy and dolly?' In her letter to Johanna, Frances was more interested in talking about the war and her dolls and the photo with the fairies was given but scant and matter of fact reporting. As if seeing fairies was to her an every day occurrence of little importance.
Three years later Mrs Wright went to a folklore lecture in Bradford with a friend. This lecture included references to fairies and following the lecture in conversation with her friend mentioned the fairy pictures. They were overheard by a friend of Edward Gardner, a leading theosophist, and Edward asked to see them.
Fred Barlow, a leading authority on psychic photography, commented to Gardner in June 1920 - 'I am inclined to think, in the absence of more detailed particulars, that the photograph showing the four dancing fairies is not what it is claimed to be.' and in December 1920 - 'I am returning herewith the three fairy photographs you very kindly loaned to me, and have no hesitation in announcing them as the most wonderful and interesting results I have ever seen.'
Gardner sought a photographer who had the ability to examine the photographs fully and so it was that Harold Snelling came to his notice. He was informed that 'What Snelling doesn't know about faked photographs isn't worth knowing.' Snelling's considered judgement, in his letter to Edward Gardner of July 31 1920, was 'These two negatives are entirely genuine unfaked photographs of single exposure, open-air work, show movement in all the fairy figures, and there is no trace whatever of studio work involving card or paper models, dark backgrounds, painted figures, etc. In my opinion, they are both straight untouched pictures.'
Mr. Gardner asked Snelling to make contact positives and two lantern slides of the photographs. These lantern slides were shown by him at a lantern lecture at Mortimer Halls, London. Through this the photographs came to the notice of Sir Arthur Conan Doyle.
On hearing of Mr. Snelling's opinion, it was proposed, and agreed, that if the negatives survived a second expert's judgment, preferably Kodak's, then Edward Gardner and Conan Doyle should join forces and make the photographs a leading feature in the Strand article. Accordingly an appointment was made with Kodak's manager. They were received by Mr. West, the manager. His studio chief and two other expert photographers were also present. The negatives were examined by all at some length, and the results of the inspection were as follows, all agreeing.
(1) The negatives are single exposure.
(2) The plates show no sign of being faked work, but that cannot be taken as conclusive evidence of genuineness.
(3) Kodak's were not willing to give any certificate c</code></pre>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/222939/http-www-cottingleyconnect-org-uk-girlfairy-htm</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 May 2026 14:47:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/222939.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 15:48:14 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.cottingleyconnect.org.uk&#x2F;girlfairy.htm on Sat, 02 May 2026 15:48:49 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>IMDb User</strong></p>
<p dir="auto">This message has been deleted.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1870065</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1870065</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 15:48:49 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.cottingleyconnect.org.uk&#x2F;girlfairy.htm on Sat, 02 May 2026 15:48:48 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>lulupalooza</strong> — <em>14 years ago(March 10, 2012 11:07 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">fantasmic_magik:<br />
"but the last picture. looks different form all the rest. I'm a photography student with Darkroom expirence and even to me it has quality's that make it look real."<br />
I guess you haven't heard or read about that photo. They used double exposure to pull off that 5th photo. By that time, people had been using that technique to hoax ghosts and spirits of loved ones.<br />
As a photography student you will probably learn about historic technique and, hopefully by now, realize how easily it was done. In our current world of digital, the general public rarely does double exposurenow its After Effects, Photoshop, etc.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1870064</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1870064</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 15:48:48 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.cottingleyconnect.org.uk&#x2F;girlfairy.htm on Sat, 02 May 2026 15:48:47 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>lulupalooza</strong> — <em>14 years ago(March 10, 2012 10:44 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">fantasmic_magik:<br />
"but the last picture. looks different form all the rest. I'm a photography student with Darkroom expirence and even to me it has quality's that make it look real."<br />
I guess you haven't heard or read about that photo. They used double exposure to pull off that 5th photo. By that time, people had been using that technique to hoax ghosts and spirits of loved ones.<br />
As a photography student you will probably learn about historic technique and, hopefully by now, realize how easily it was done. In our current world of digital, the general public rarely does double exposurenow its After Effects, Photoshop, etc.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1870063</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1870063</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 15:48:47 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.cottingleyconnect.org.uk&#x2F;girlfairy.htm on Sat, 02 May 2026 15:48:46 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Lazaka</strong> — <em>17 years ago(March 17, 2009 11:39 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">They're so fake it's pathetic. I think they were trying to make their families believe so it would make them feel better and give them hope in a troubled time. Else was 16 when she did these and an adult when all the press hit, I suppose that is why she confessed in the end. Besides, you can see the pins, lol.<br />
For someone not to believe the confession is pretty disturbing to me. Believe in Faries if you want (wouldn't we all love it if they were real, but alas I do not believe) but don't discredit someone's confession when they're trying to clear their conscience, it's not very nice.<br />
Mr. President Barack H. Obama <img src="https://filmglance.com/discuss/assets/plugins/nodebb-plugin-emoji/emoji/android/1f603.png?v=8570fb93240" class="not-responsive emoji emoji-android emoji--smiley" style="height:23px;width:auto;vertical-align:middle" title="=)" alt="😃" /></p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1870062</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1870062</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 15:48:46 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.cottingleyconnect.org.uk&#x2F;girlfairy.htm on Sat, 02 May 2026 15:48:45 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>liz_friz</strong> — <em>17 years ago(February 05, 2009 01:04 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Doesn't anybody have a creative eye? Surely, you can see that the lighting is all wrong and they are flat.<br />
Look, I have no problem with you all believing in fairies if the image makes them appear realthese just look far too fake.<br />
<em>Tugging my braid since 1991</em></p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1870061</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1870061</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 15:48:45 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.cottingleyconnect.org.uk&#x2F;girlfairy.htm on Sat, 02 May 2026 15:48:44 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>fantasmic_magik</strong> — <em>18 years ago(November 18, 2007 08:06 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">In my opinion, what I see is 4 very clever fakes by some girls that wanted their loved ones to believe in what they both saw. The media blew it out of porpotian and so they got tired of it..but the last picture. looks different form all the rest. I'm a photography student with Darkroom expirence and even to me it has quality's that make it look real. So maybe they did see faires and faked some photos to make themselves and others feel betterbut in the end, it dosent matter because as long as someone believes, fairys exist. <img src="https://filmglance.com/discuss/assets/plugins/nodebb-plugin-emoji/emoji/android/1f61b.png?v=8570fb93240" class="not-responsive emoji emoji-android emoji--stuck_out_tongue" style="height:23px;width:auto;vertical-align:middle" title=":p" alt="😛" /><br />
I sail the seven seas with Jack and brew potions in the dungon. I'm a <em>beep</em> Bleeder as well.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1870060</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1870060</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 15:48:44 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.cottingleyconnect.org.uk&#x2F;girlfairy.htm on Sat, 02 May 2026 15:48:43 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>goopah</strong> — <em>18 years ago(November 18, 2007 07:29 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I find all this debate quite amusing.<br />
In the end, does it really matter if they're real or not?<br />
Some of life's greatest pleasures can be found in the mysteries, not the solutions.<br />
There are a lot of things we don't know about.<br />
Maybe it's best that way.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1870059</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1870059</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 15:48:43 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.cottingleyconnect.org.uk&#x2F;girlfairy.htm on Sat, 02 May 2026 15:48:41 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>dreamer-santiago80</strong> — <em>11 years ago(December 22, 2014 06:16 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Opinions guys, stop trying to one up each other like children.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1870058</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1870058</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 15:48:41 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.cottingleyconnect.org.uk&#x2F;girlfairy.htm on Sat, 02 May 2026 15:48:40 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>heather_blus</strong> — <em>17 years ago(November 29, 2008 03:57 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">"You seem pretty aggressive and condescending here. Perhaps it's you who needs psychiatric help ?"<br />
Nope, I just calls ems as I sees em.<br />
Funny how you say this, yet you yourself take the time to reply.  Hmmm.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1870057</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1870057</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 15:48:40 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.cottingleyconnect.org.uk&#x2F;girlfairy.htm on Sat, 02 May 2026 15:48:39 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>puirt-a-beul</strong> — <em>18 years ago(June 01, 2007 07:18 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Yeah,<br />
heather_blus<br />
, you've got a right to your opinion, but remember it's just that:  your opinion.  It's not automatically superior judgement, and it's not automatically the truth.<br />
You seem pretty aggressive and condescending here.  Perhaps it's<br />
you<br />
who needs psychiatric help ?<br />
Regarding fairies:  I can conceive of such a thing existing, but that doesn't mean I actively<br />
believe<br />
.<br />
My own take on the photos is that they're constructed.  Fake, in other words.  They look like two girls got creative with their hobbies of drawing and photography, and produced something they expected their parents to find pleasing or endearing, but that it all got out of hand and blown out of proportion.  It must have just got harder and harder to 'fess up, and I can imagine it became something of a quiet embarrassment to the women as the years passed.<br />
I was amused by the reference on the website to the sun-bath photo, that pointed out the "magnetic bath" (what?!??) feature as being something fairies supposedly actually do but that the girls wouldn't have known about when they made the shot, as if that unproven assertion somehow authenticates the picture.  So I want to know:  who's the alleged "authority" that says this is real-world fairy behaviour, and what's the source of their own "knowledge"  other than this very picture, I mean.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1870056</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1870056</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 15:48:39 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.cottingleyconnect.org.uk&#x2F;girlfairy.htm on Sat, 02 May 2026 15:48:38 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>heather_blus</strong> — <em>18 years ago(May 01, 2007 04:40 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">"I wasn't asking your opinion.<br />
I'm not judging you by what you think, so don't judge me."<br />
I have a right to my opinion, and I think anyone who believes in fairies is not playing with a full deck.  By the way, Elsie never claimed to see fairies.  Do you still believe now that she did even though she admits she didn't?  If so, then that's saaaaaaaaaad.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1870055</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1870055</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 15:48:38 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.cottingleyconnect.org.uk&#x2F;girlfairy.htm on Sat, 02 May 2026 15:48:37 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>ForeverMagicle</strong> — <em>19 years ago(March 19, 2007 08:37 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I wasn't asking your opinion.<br />
I'm not judging you by what you think, so don't judge me.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1870054</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1870054</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 15:48:37 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.cottingleyconnect.org.uk&#x2F;girlfairy.htm on Sat, 02 May 2026 15:48:36 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>heather_blus</strong> — <em>19 years ago(March 18, 2007 02:43 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">"I think it's very possible that they really did see fairies.<br />
Maybe some of the photos were fakes because they just needed some sort of proof so that people would believe them. (It's also possible there not fakes)<br />
And when one of the girls confessed that it was a hoax she could have just been pretending it was a hoax so that people would leave her alone.<br />
And one of those photos looks very real to me.<br />
I don't know about all of you, but that's what I think. "<br />
I think you need psychiatric help if you believe in fairies.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1870053</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1870053</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 15:48:36 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.cottingleyconnect.org.uk&#x2F;girlfairy.htm on Sat, 02 May 2026 15:48:35 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>baileypinkrose</strong> — <em>19 years ago(March 18, 2007 04:41 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I think what we had here were incredible young artists with great imaginations. I saw a painting that one of the girls did and it was full of detail, it was colorful and just amazing.<br />
Not to say that fairies aren't real, though. I do have to say the one with the sunbath, the fairies do look 3 dementional. And that is the one the girl maintained was the only real picture. I guess you would only really know if you saw one yourself.<br />
"If I had no sense of humor, I would long ago have committed suicide."-Gandhi</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1870052</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1870052</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 15:48:35 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.cottingleyconnect.org.uk&#x2F;girlfairy.htm on Sat, 02 May 2026 15:48:34 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>ForeverMagicle</strong> — <em>19 years ago(March 17, 2007 12:11 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I think it's very possible that they really did see fairies.<br />
Maybe some of the photos were fakes because they just needed some sort of proof so that people would believe them. (It's also possible there not fakes)<br />
And when one of the girls confessed that it was a hoax she could have just been pretending it was a hoax so that people would leave her alone.<br />
And one of those photos looks very real to me.<br />
I don't know about all of you, but that's what I think.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1870051</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1870051</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 15:48:34 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.cottingleyconnect.org.uk&#x2F;girlfairy.htm on Sat, 02 May 2026 15:48:33 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>IMDb User</strong></p>
<p dir="auto">This message has been deleted.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1870050</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1870050</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 15:48:33 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.cottingleyconnect.org.uk&#x2F;girlfairy.htm on Sat, 02 May 2026 15:48:31 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Horseman123</strong> — <em>19 years ago(November 05, 2006 08:15 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">The photos are so obviously fake. I mean look at them. Why is it that all the faries are flat? They aren't three dimensional like the girls are. Even when you look at the faries closer you see a black dot from where the pin sticking out is. Why is it that none of these photos have faries behind her? Around her? Why are they always infront? You can tell this is a posing photograph. Just like when you pose for a picture everyone is in front. This was clearly set up. Why is it there is never more than one photo for each section? For example the one where there are fairies dancing infront of her. Why is there only one picture for that? It seems they only took one picture in a different area, planning it out. If these fairies were indeed moving and dancing around her there would be no problem taking numerous pictures. They clearly took time setting up things so they couldn't take as many pictures.<br />
I mean for petes sake people look at the freaking paper cutouts. They are just horrible. The legs don't equal eachother. The arms are disproportionate to the body. In some of these pictures one foot is bigger than the other and when you look at the legs and wings they are rigid and not smooth.<br />
And gosh their faces. I mean c'mon people, their faces are litterally dots. Some people may so oh it's because they are smaller so you can't really see. But if these were indeed people we would see alot more detail. I mean look at their faces! It's just black dots for shadow! And in one of the pictures the lady doesn't even have a mouth!</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1870049</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1870049</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 15:48:31 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.cottingleyconnect.org.uk&#x2F;girlfairy.htm on Sat, 02 May 2026 15:48:30 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>actorlady</strong> — <em>19 years ago(October 11, 2006 04:17 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Even if the photos are fake fairies could still exist. I believe in fairies.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1870048</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1870048</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 15:48:30 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.cottingleyconnect.org.uk&#x2F;girlfairy.htm on Sat, 02 May 2026 15:48:29 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>SnowMoonFalling</strong> — <em>19 years ago(January 13, 2007 07:03 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Although I'm fond of faeriesand like to believe in themI never thought the photos were real.  The posted pictures, above, are very clear and I have to wonder how grown people would judge them as Real, even if a little unbalanced by grief.  They are so obviously faked.  You can't blame the girlsit would seem to me to have been a private thing that the adults ran away with.  I always thought it made Conan-Doyle rather an a**.<br />
Nevertheless I think this is a cute movie and one of the better ones for children.<br />
"Blame is for God and small children."Louis Degas<br />
Papillon</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1870047</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1870047</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 15:48:29 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.cottingleyconnect.org.uk&#x2F;girlfairy.htm on Sat, 02 May 2026 15:48:28 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>corimcd</strong> — <em>19 years ago(December 31, 2006 12:20 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Sorry it took me so long to get back here.<br />
thank you for answering my question nieko-ner.<br />
That photo does look somewhat different compared to others.<br />
I wonder why she said that one was real ?<br />
This story really interests me. I hope to find some books<br />
on the subject.<br />
thanks again</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1870046</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1870046</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 15:48:28 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.cottingleyconnect.org.uk&#x2F;girlfairy.htm on Sat, 02 May 2026 15:48:27 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>nieko-ner</strong> — <em>19 years ago(September 30, 2006 04:39 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">have read somewhere that she said the last photo was real, the one with fairies in a sunbath.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1870045</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1870045</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 15:48:27 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.cottingleyconnect.org.uk&#x2F;girlfairy.htm on Sat, 02 May 2026 15:48:26 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>corimcd</strong> — <em>19 years ago(September 11, 2006 10:35 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">.Frances was born 1907 and following the fairy affair returned to South Africa. She always maintained that at least one of the photos was not fake. She died in 1986<br />
Do you know , or does anyone know, which photo that would be??<br />
I also wonder how they did the leaping fairy photo ?</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1870044</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1870044</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 15:48:26 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.cottingleyconnect.org.uk&#x2F;girlfairy.htm on Sat, 02 May 2026 15:48:25 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>wakazashi</strong> — <em>19 years ago(August 19, 2006 12:59 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Oh my god, Elsie looks like my mom</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1870043</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1870043</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 15:48:25 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.cottingleyconnect.org.uk&#x2F;girlfairy.htm on Sat, 02 May 2026 15:48:24 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>v_v_60</strong> — <em>19 years ago(May 02, 2006 12:13 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">This was sooo interesting thankyou for for posting it. I can remember seeing one of the girls (very old lady}interviewed on Nationwide many many years ago when i was about thirteen always fascinated me, they asked her at the end of the interview if any of it was true and my mum turned it off quickly and said to my sister and me lets not find out some things are best left as a mystery!! I was miffed at the time but totally agree with her now.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1870042</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1870042</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 15:48:24 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>