<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Marg Helgenberger is all you could ask for]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Fire Down Below</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>ilivingston-1</strong> — <em>18 years ago(August 10, 2007 08:38 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I remember seeing Ms. Helgenberger before "Fire Down Below" in the early '90s(her small part in 1995's "Bad Boys" for one)and thinking what a good actress and beautiful lady.Then along came this movie and now every week on "CSI".She just seems to get better looking and her talent <a href="http://grows.In" rel="nofollow ugc">grows.In</a> an age segrated industry she does exceptionally well and I hope her star continues to do well.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/223052/marg-helgenberger-is-all-you-could-ask-for</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 May 2026 22:36:57 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/223052.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 16:01:10 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Marg Helgenberger is all you could ask for on Sat, 02 May 2026 16:01:16 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>FridayOnElmStreet</strong> — <em>11 years ago(December 09, 2014 11:23 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Indeed she was and still is hot!</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1870727</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1870727</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 16:01:16 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Marg Helgenberger is all you could ask for on Sat, 02 May 2026 16:01:15 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>WingMaker</strong> — <em>15 years ago(July 03, 2010 03:02 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Yeah, She was very beautiful in Fire Down Below (1997) clean and simple I also like the whole southern motif on her, No make-up just naturally beautiful and clean.<br />
Some how when i think of her, I always think of her with the Fire Down Below look.<br />
I remember her also was equally beautiful in what i think was a 007 movie when there was that scene in a river or a lake and a bit of her breast was shown which i think was natural at the time but i could be mistaken.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1870726</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1870726</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 16:01:15 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Marg Helgenberger is all you could ask for on Sat, 02 May 2026 16:01:14 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>SeisCinemaSeis</strong> — <em>15 years ago(May 23, 2010 05:11 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Agree, Marg Helgenberger is/was a very beautiful woman (haven't seen her in recent movies). First time I saw her was in Spielberg's 'Always' (1989), where she looks ravishing. I never understood why that foolish pilot chose Holly Hunter over Marg, though.<br />
She still looks fine in 'Fire Down Below'. More than fine actually.<br />
I repeat I haven't seen her in recent films. However I have seen some recent pictures of her. What can I say? she looks like a 52 years-old woman. Nothing more, nothing less. You know, youth (and beauty) doesn't last forever. Anyway she's always gonna look stunningly beautiful in movies like 'Always' or 'Fire Down Below' for cinema is timeless.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1870725</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1870725</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 16:01:14 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Marg Helgenberger is all you could ask for on Sat, 02 May 2026 16:01:12 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>rhopmans</strong> — <em>16 years ago(February 25, 2010 09:15 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">You guys are whacked<br />
I developed a crush on her because of this movie.<br />
I thought she WAS beautiful, now shes thin to the point of looking malnurished and she's got more plastic on her face then a life size barbie doll.<br />
All that surgery has seemed to limit the movements she can make with her face so now she always has the same expression.<br />
People who like that are the reason rubber dollys are still a big seller in the States.<br />
Wake up man<br />
Why is nautral becoming un-desireable.<br />
Watch the movie Surrogates man.<br />
She ruined herself with being unhappy with herself and the need to look perfect.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1870724</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1870724</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 16:01:12 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Marg Helgenberger is all you could ask for on Sat, 02 May 2026 16:01:11 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>fernyperez</strong> — <em>16 years ago(September 06, 2009 02:36 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Agree 100%<br />
What a beautiful woman, whichever way you look at her. One of the best milfs in Hollywood today.<br />
Hilarious the weird relationship Seagal bestows on her in the movie, with the small pats on the back, and no kisses whatsoever, Im pretty sure Marg stated that in her movie contract, LOL</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1870723</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1870723</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 16:01:11 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>