<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Does it deserve cult status?]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Good Burger</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>IMDB_Vits</strong> — <em>10 years ago(October 21, 2015 06:29 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">He thinks so:<br />
<a href="http://editorial.rottentomatoes.com/article/does-good-burger-deserve-cult-status" rel="nofollow ugc">http://editorial.rottentomatoes.com/article/does-good-burger-deserve-cult-status</a><br />
I don't think it does.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/223247/does-it-deserve-cult-status</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 May 2026 14:57:08 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/223247.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 16:32:32 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Does it deserve cult status? on Sat, 02 May 2026 16:32:38 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>YYMBRrecords</strong> — <em>9 years ago(January 14, 2017 02:45 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Well said!</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1872367</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1872367</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 16:32:38 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Does it deserve cult status? on Sat, 02 May 2026 16:32:37 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>josephnatescott</strong> — <em>9 years ago(June 24, 2016 10:31 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">It does. Kel Mitchell was funnier in this movie (in part thanks to a good script) than, for instance, Macauley Culkin was in Home Alone or Brian O'Halloran was in Clerks.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1872366</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1872366</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 16:32:37 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Does it deserve cult status? on Sat, 02 May 2026 16:32:35 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>This_dood</strong> — <em>10 years ago(December 12, 2015 10:39 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">F uu k yeah it does! !</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1872365</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1872365</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 16:32:35 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Does it deserve cult status? on Sat, 02 May 2026 16:32:34 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>novastar_6</strong> — <em>10 years ago(November 15, 2015 10:38 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Oh hell yes!</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1872364</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1872364</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 16:32:34 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Does it deserve cult status? on Sat, 02 May 2026 16:32:33 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>mockingbirdfreak</strong> — <em>10 years ago(November 04, 2015 12:50 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Definitely!!</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1872363</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1872363</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 16:32:33 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>