<![CDATA[Rated R? Seriously?]]>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Snow White: A Tale of Terror

DeRo64 — 13 years ago(June 11, 2012 01:46 PM)

This has barely enough risky content to warrant a PG-13, much less an R. Was the MPAA filled with uber-conservatives in 1996-1997?
"There is no escape, John!"

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/223452/rated-r-seriouslyRSS for NodeWed, 13 May 2026 12:44:32 GMTSat, 02 May 2026 17:01:59 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to Rated R? Seriously? on Sat, 02 May 2026 17:02:12 GMT]]>rc1990 — 9 years ago(October 15, 2016 03:37 PM)

No it was meant to be released in theatre from the beginning. They changed their minds at the last minute.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1873904https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1873904Sat, 02 May 2026 17:02:12 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Rated R? Seriously? on Sat, 02 May 2026 17:02:11 GMT]]>psmithyyyyy — 9 years ago(May 23, 2016 10:18 PM)

I don't know about you people, but damn I thought this movie was quite disturbing, it was very unsettling. ive never seen a fairy tale this dark and twisted before, and it was great so I can see why they have the R. wasn't this a tv movie though?

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1873903https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1873903Sat, 02 May 2026 17:02:11 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Rated R? Seriously? on Sat, 02 May 2026 17:02:10 GMT]]>mikebourkefan — 12 years ago(December 12, 2013 09:38 AM)

this is a sad post. looks like your saying Monica Keena was not naked in this
Rob Zombie is one of the greatest directors today

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1873902https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1873902Sat, 02 May 2026 17:02:10 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Rated R? Seriously? on Sat, 02 May 2026 17:02:09 GMT]]>Rena_Mahone — 12 years ago(December 06, 2013 04:39 PM)

It is a PG-13 to me, ok for ages 14 and up.
The R-Rating is too much, there is nothing so extreme or graphic in this movie.
Boycott movies that involve real animal violence! (and their directors too)

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1873901https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1873901Sat, 02 May 2026 17:02:09 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Rated R? Seriously? on Sat, 02 May 2026 17:02:07 GMT]]>DeRo64 — 13 years ago(March 15, 2013 08:40 PM)

It's been a while since I've seen this topic, and longer still since I've seen the movie. I'll have to give it another go so I can see what you're referring to.
"There is no escape, John!"

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1873900https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1873900Sat, 02 May 2026 17:02:07 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Rated R? Seriously? on Sat, 02 May 2026 17:02:06 GMT]]>bthr — 13 years ago(March 15, 2013 02:45 PM)

there is a rape attempt, but it was stopped in the before it started with a knife.
murders, animal killing(raven), dogs attacks and more.
they also probably rated it R because teen-adult relationship.
according to american rating, its an easy R but in europe it could get 13 or less.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1873899https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1873899Sat, 02 May 2026 17:02:06 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Rated R? Seriously? on Sat, 02 May 2026 17:02:05 GMT]]>Leave_it_to_Weaver — 13 years ago(August 26, 2012 01:46 PM)

I love your signature! I've seen MASH a zillion times and that line uttered by the underated Larry Linville is priceless.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1873898https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1873898Sat, 02 May 2026 17:02:05 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Rated R? Seriously? on Sat, 02 May 2026 17:02:04 GMT]]>DeRo64 — 13 years ago(June 19, 2012 09:51 AM)

I just don't get it. The Messenger had more gore and profanity and it got a PG-13.
Well, the version
I
saw was PG-13.
"There is no escape, John!"

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1873897https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1873897Sat, 02 May 2026 17:02:04 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Rated R? Seriously? on Sat, 02 May 2026 17:02:03 GMT]]>jamesericmcgee — 13 years ago(June 17, 2012 03:41 PM)

SPOILER I reckon it may have been Claudia "Doing her wifely duties" as she put it, trying to conceive again with her husband sick, bed-ridden, and held captive. Rape should be rated R, I guess?
"The only reason I'm paranoid is because everyone's against me." - Frank Burns of MASH

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1873896https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1873896Sat, 02 May 2026 17:02:03 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Rated R? Seriously? on Sat, 02 May 2026 17:02:01 GMT]]>DeRo64 — 13 years ago(June 16, 2012 09:51 PM)

I saw that documentary about two years ago after asking if homosexuality bumped up age-ratings in video games and movies.
So was it the dead baby?
"There is no escape, John!"

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1873895https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1873895Sat, 02 May 2026 17:02:01 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Rated R? Seriously? on Sat, 02 May 2026 17:02:00 GMT]]>jamesericmcgee — 13 years ago(June 16, 2012 07:44 AM)

See the documentary This Movie Is Not Yet Rated, and all will be revealed about how meaningless ratings are.
"The only reason I'm paranoid is because everyone's against me." - Frank Burns of MASH

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1873894https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1873894Sat, 02 May 2026 17:02:00 GMT