<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[This has barely enough risky content to warrant a PG-13, much less an R. Was the MPAA filled with uber-conservatives in]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Snow White: A Tale of Terror</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>DeRo64</strong> — <em>13 years ago(June 11, 2012 01:46 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">This has barely enough risky content to warrant a PG-13, much less an R. Was the MPAA filled with uber-conservatives in 1996-1997?<br />
"There is no escape, John!"</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/223453/this-has-barely-enough-risky-content-to-warrant-a-pg-13-much-less-an-r-was-the-mpaa-filled-with-uber-conservatives-in</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 May 2026 08:00:37 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/223453.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 17:02:13 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to This has barely enough risky content to warrant a PG-13, much less an R. Was the MPAA filled with uber-conservatives in on Sat, 02 May 2026 17:02:26 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>rc1990</strong> — <em>9 years ago(October 15, 2016 03:37 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">No it was meant to be released in theatre from the beginning. They changed their minds at the last minute.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1873916</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1873916</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 17:02:26 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to This has barely enough risky content to warrant a PG-13, much less an R. Was the MPAA filled with uber-conservatives in on Sat, 02 May 2026 17:02:25 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>psmithyyyyy</strong> — <em>9 years ago(May 23, 2016 10:18 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I don't know about you people, but damn I thought this movie was quite disturbing, it was very unsettling. ive never seen a fairy tale this dark and twisted before, and it was great so I can see why they have the R. wasn't this a tv movie though?</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1873915</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1873915</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 17:02:25 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to This has barely enough risky content to warrant a PG-13, much less an R. Was the MPAA filled with uber-conservatives in on Sat, 02 May 2026 17:02:24 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>mikebourkefan</strong> — <em>12 years ago(December 12, 2013 09:38 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">this is a sad post. looks like your saying Monica Keena was not naked in this<br />
Rob Zombie is one of the greatest directors today</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1873914</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1873914</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 17:02:24 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to This has barely enough risky content to warrant a PG-13, much less an R. Was the MPAA filled with uber-conservatives in on Sat, 02 May 2026 17:02:23 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Rena_Mahone</strong> — <em>12 years ago(December 06, 2013 04:39 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">It is a PG-13 to me, ok for ages 14 and up.<br />
The R-Rating is too much, there is nothing so extreme or graphic in this movie.<br />
Boycott movies that involve real animal violence! (and their directors too)</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1873913</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1873913</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 17:02:23 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to This has barely enough risky content to warrant a PG-13, much less an R. Was the MPAA filled with uber-conservatives in on Sat, 02 May 2026 17:02:22 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>DeRo64</strong> — <em>13 years ago(March 15, 2013 08:40 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">It's been a while since I've seen this topic, and longer still since I've seen the movie. I'll have to give it another go so I can see what you're referring to.<br />
"There is no escape, John!"</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1873912</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1873912</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 17:02:22 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to This has barely enough risky content to warrant a PG-13, much less an R. Was the MPAA filled with uber-conservatives in on Sat, 02 May 2026 17:02:20 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>bthr</strong> — <em>13 years ago(March 15, 2013 02:45 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">there is a rape attempt, but it was stopped in the before it started with a knife.<br />
murders, animal killing(raven), dogs attacks and more.<br />
they also probably rated it R because teen-adult relationship.<br />
according to american rating, its an easy R but in europe it could get 13 or less.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1873911</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1873911</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 17:02:20 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to This has barely enough risky content to warrant a PG-13, much less an R. Was the MPAA filled with uber-conservatives in on Sat, 02 May 2026 17:02:19 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Leave_it_to_Weaver</strong> — <em>13 years ago(August 26, 2012 01:46 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I love your signature! I've seen MASH a zillion times and that line uttered by the underated Larry Linville is priceless.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1873910</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1873910</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 17:02:19 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to This has barely enough risky content to warrant a PG-13, much less an R. Was the MPAA filled with uber-conservatives in on Sat, 02 May 2026 17:02:18 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>DeRo64</strong> — <em>13 years ago(June 19, 2012 09:51 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I just don't get it. The Messenger had more gore and profanity and it got a PG-13.<br />
Well, the version<br />
I<br />
saw was PG-13.<br />
"There is no escape, John!"</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1873909</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1873909</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 17:02:18 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to This has barely enough risky content to warrant a PG-13, much less an R. Was the MPAA filled with uber-conservatives in on Sat, 02 May 2026 17:02:17 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>jamesericmcgee</strong> — <em>13 years ago(June 17, 2012 03:41 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto"><em><strong>SPOILER</strong></em>  I reckon it may have been Claudia "Doing her wifely duties" as she put it, trying to conceive again with her husband sick, bed-ridden, and held captive. Rape should be rated R, I guess?<br />
"The only reason I'm paranoid is because everyone's against me." - Frank Burns of M<em>A</em>S<em>H</em></p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1873908</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1873908</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 17:02:17 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to This has barely enough risky content to warrant a PG-13, much less an R. Was the MPAA filled with uber-conservatives in on Sat, 02 May 2026 17:02:16 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>DeRo64</strong> — <em>13 years ago(June 16, 2012 09:51 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I saw that documentary about two years ago after asking if homosexuality bumped up age-ratings in video games and movies.<br />
So was it the dead baby?<br />
"There is no escape, John!"</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1873907</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1873907</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 17:02:16 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to This has barely enough risky content to warrant a PG-13, much less an R. Was the MPAA filled with uber-conservatives in on Sat, 02 May 2026 17:02:15 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>jamesericmcgee</strong> — <em>13 years ago(June 16, 2012 07:44 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">See the documentary This Movie Is Not Yet Rated, and all will be revealed about how meaningless ratings are.<br />
"The only reason I'm paranoid is because everyone's against me." - Frank Burns of M<em>A</em>S<em>H</em></p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1873906</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1873906</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 17:02:15 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>