<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[L.A. Confidential]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — L.A. Confidential</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>fnj2002</strong> — <em>12 years ago(March 22, 2014 07:31 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">L.A. Confidential<br />
or<br />
Chinatown<br />
?</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/223822/l-a-confidential</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 May 2026 15:28:28 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/223822.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 18:09:11 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to L.A. Confidential on Sat, 02 May 2026 18:10:02 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>huwdj</strong> — <em>7 months ago(August 10, 2025 06:20 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">L.A. Story<br />
I have always depended on the kindness of Strangers - and the bastards let me down!</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1877423</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1877423</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 18:10:02 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to L.A. Confidential on Sat, 02 May 2026 18:10:01 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>P.Error</strong> — <em>7 months ago(August 10, 2025 05:42 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Terminator 2.<br />
Never lose your desire.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1877422</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1877422</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 18:10:01 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to L.A. Confidential on Sat, 02 May 2026 18:09:59 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>meguroutsubo</strong> — <em>9 years ago(October 15, 2016 07:09 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Chinatown.<br />
But this was a much better film than I expected it to be.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1877421</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1877421</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 18:09:59 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to L.A. Confidential on Sat, 02 May 2026 18:09:58 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>zappalover</strong> — <em>9 years ago(September 22, 2016 12:25 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Practically impossible for any film to top Chinatown; when the topic is LA, it is the best, period.  LA Confidential is the second best for many of us born after 1945.  It's great to see Curtis Hanson receiving so much praise post-mortem.  A stellar detective film, though one can quibble with its upbeat ending.<br />
Life is a state of mind.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1877420</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1877420</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 18:09:58 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to L.A. Confidential on Sat, 02 May 2026 18:09:57 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>siltom1962</strong> — <em>9 years ago(September 14, 2016 12:28 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Chinatown, but this is a very close 2nd.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1877419</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1877419</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 18:09:57 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to L.A. Confidential on Sat, 02 May 2026 18:09:56 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>ironmaiden82-622-630040</strong> — <em>9 years ago(May 15, 2016 09:07 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Blade Runner and Pulp Fiction</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1877418</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1877418</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 18:09:56 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to L.A. Confidential on Sat, 02 May 2026 18:09:55 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>chninlp</strong> — <em>9 years ago(April 16, 2016 05:34 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">It's not at all close which is the better film.  One film is clearly superior than the other in practically every aspect.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1877417</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1877417</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 18:09:55 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to L.A. Confidential on Sat, 02 May 2026 18:09:54 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>tlee222</strong> — <em>9 years ago(April 15, 2016 08:52 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">The OP is all over it. There are some good movies mentioned in the interim, but it does come down to Chinatown and L.A. Confidential.<br />
I personally prefer L.A. Conf. (watch it at least twice every year), but historical standards tells me Chinatown is the better movie.<br />
But it's damn close.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1877416</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1877416</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 18:09:54 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to L.A. Confidential on Sat, 02 May 2026 18:09:53 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>hafabee</strong> — <em>9 years ago(April 14, 2016 10:18 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I was going to say<br />
Chinatown<br />
before I even opened your thread.<br />
But<br />
L.A. Confidential<br />
is terrific, I just saw it again recently and it seems to get better with every viewing.  I think it has even more watch-ability than<br />
Chinatown<br />
, which, while excellent, is depressing.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1877415</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1877415</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 18:09:53 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to L.A. Confidential on Sat, 02 May 2026 18:09:52 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>jacka-katherine</strong> — <em>10 years ago(March 07, 2016 09:38 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Not just those two. I would add The Big Sleep, Day of the Locust and Heat.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1877414</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1877414</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 18:09:52 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to L.A. Confidential on Sat, 02 May 2026 18:09:51 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>renergy</strong> — <em>11 years ago(February 15, 2015 11:17 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Pulp Fiction.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1877413</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1877413</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 18:09:51 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to L.A. Confidential on Sat, 02 May 2026 18:09:49 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>armanmarok</strong> — <em>11 years ago(November 30, 2014 08:27 PM)</em></p>
<h2>That would be<br />
Kiss Me Deadly<br />
.</h2>
<p dir="auto">My Top 100 Favorite Films:<br />
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/list/ls071561044/" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.imdb.com/list/ls071561044/</a></p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1877412</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1877412</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 18:09:49 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to L.A. Confidential on Sat, 02 May 2026 18:09:48 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Koomsic</strong> — <em>11 years ago(November 10, 2014 07:34 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">What about Falling Down ?<br />
IMO</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1877411</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1877411</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 18:09:48 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to L.A. Confidential on Sat, 02 May 2026 18:09:47 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>PUmatty</strong> — <em>11 years ago(November 05, 2014 07:28 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">The Player deserves a mention.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1877410</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1877410</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 18:09:47 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to L.A. Confidential on Sat, 02 May 2026 18:09:46 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>ddb540</strong> — <em>11 years ago(October 31, 2014 09:16 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">The Big Lebowski</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1877409</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1877409</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 18:09:46 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to L.A. Confidential on Sat, 02 May 2026 18:09:45 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>hnt_dnl</strong> — <em>11 years ago(October 28, 2014 01:34 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Neither.<br />
Collateral<br />
should hold that honor.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1877408</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1877408</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 18:09:45 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to L.A. Confidential on Sat, 02 May 2026 18:09:44 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Mickolynj</strong> — <em>9 years ago(October 05, 2016 07:46 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Finally someone lists "Mulholland Falls"   Thank you!<br />
My rating would be exactly like yours.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1877407</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1877407</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 18:09:44 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to L.A. Confidential on Sat, 02 May 2026 18:09:43 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>requiem_foradream</strong> — <em>11 years ago(September 28, 2014 01:20 PM)</em></p>
<ol>
<li>Chinatown</li>
<li>LA Confidential</li>
<li>Mulholland Drive</li>
</ol>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1877406</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1877406</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 18:09:43 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to L.A. Confidential on Sat, 02 May 2026 18:09:41 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>drew-415</strong> — <em>10 years ago(November 24, 2015 01:40 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Line-Up is San Francisco</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1877405</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1877405</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 18:09:41 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to L.A. Confidential on Sat, 02 May 2026 18:09:40 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>rp69</strong> — <em>11 years ago(November 10, 2014 08:07 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I'm posting to you mgtbltp because you're the only person to mention a true LA classic.<br />
Have you seen the Lineup 195x? Eli Wallach and I think Farley Granger. It's a really good movie, but the commentary track has James Elroy and another film historian giving a tour of old LA. The entire movie was shot on location all over Los Angeles. Not only is the commentary interesting, but it's absolutely hysterical. James Elroy is insane!</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1877404</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1877404</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 18:09:40 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to L.A. Confidential on Sat, 02 May 2026 18:09:39 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>ridge-m-1</strong> — <em>11 years ago(December 14, 2014 06:51 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Finally, one reads these posts and nobody mentions Double Indemnity until now. This aficionado will add another, Sunset Boulevard. Add Chinatown and the viewer has a triple feature of masterpieces.<br />
Joe Gillis: You're Norma Desmond. You used to be in silent pictures. You used to be big.<br />
Norma Desmond: I AM big. It's the pictures that got small.<br />
LAC falls a little short of the aforementioned competition although Hanson uses wonderful locations and Helgeland's adaptation of Ellroy's novel was a Herculean task to come up with a filmable screenplay. A thoroughly enjoyable picture but let's keep the competition in perspective.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1877403</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1877403</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 18:09:39 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to L.A. Confidential on Sat, 02 May 2026 18:09:38 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>IMDb User</strong></p>
<p dir="auto">This message has been deleted.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1877402</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1877402</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 18:09:38 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to L.A. Confidential on Sat, 02 May 2026 18:09:37 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>john-daly-532-644927</strong> — <em>11 years ago(September 22, 2014 02:06 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Agree with a lot of the candidates mentioned, but how about: Jacky Brown, The Big Sleep (1946), Shampoo, Singing in the Rain, Rebel Without a Cause, Devil in a Blue Dress, Clueless, L.A. Story, True Confessions or The Day of the Locust?</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1877401</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1877401</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 18:09:37 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to L.A. Confidential on Sat, 02 May 2026 18:09:36 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>IMDb User</strong></p>
<p dir="auto">This message has been deleted.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1877400</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1877400</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 18:09:36 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>