<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Has it aged well?]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — L.A. Confidential</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>pleymo12345</strong> — <em>14 years ago(January 17, 2012 10:14 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Hi,<br />
would you say this movie has aged well and remains a classic, enjoyable watch? I think I saw this when I was much younger, however I can't remember a thing. I tend to prefer more recent films but I'm tempted to watch it again.<br />
Thanks! <img src="https://filmglance.com/discuss/assets/plugins/nodebb-plugin-emoji/emoji/android/1f642.png?v=8570fb93240" class="not-responsive emoji emoji-android emoji--slightly_smiling_face" style="height:23px;width:auto;vertical-align:middle" title=":)" alt="🙂" /></p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/223851/has-it-aged-well</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 May 2026 16:14:54 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/223851.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 18:12:28 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Has it aged well? on Sat, 02 May 2026 18:13:21 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Steve17109</strong> — <em>9 years ago(May 15, 2016 06:33 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Yes. Just watched it again. Hard to believe next year will be the twentieth anniversary of it's premiere.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1877605</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1877605</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 18:13:21 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Has it aged well? on Sat, 02 May 2026 18:13:20 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>exaybachay84</strong> — <em>9 years ago(May 09, 2016 03:32 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">It hasn't aged at all. It's still great, definitely a classic. Which it was immadietaly in the first place when I watched back in 1997.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1877604</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1877604</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 18:13:20 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Has it aged well? on Sat, 02 May 2026 18:13:19 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>clickbait</strong> — <em>9 years ago(April 24, 2016 11:49 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">yes it really hasnow its 2016 and I thought it was still awsome in every way, even the blood squibs are way better than todays lame CGI blood and wounds.<br />
~If the realistic details fails, the movie fails~</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1877603</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1877603</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 18:13:19 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Has it aged well? on Sat, 02 May 2026 18:13:17 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>cbee43</strong> — <em>11 years ago(January 26, 2015 02:23 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Savasmoviesit ways very racist back then where cops are concerned..same thing now,no different in 2014 with these rabid,racist cops against Blacks and Hispanics now. More things change the more they stay the same</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1877602</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1877602</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 18:13:17 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Has it aged well? on Sat, 02 May 2026 18:13:16 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>sebaser</strong> — <em>11 years ago(December 19, 2014 01:08 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Just watched it, better than 95% crap you get to see nowadays, so i would say it could not age since cinema didnt move a bit forward since then.<br />
But it does have few of those 90ties tropes like a big shootout near the end and having that cinematic reality feel where its not exactly realistic but not too cartoonish, but cant really blame it for it, its just that style of movie.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1877601</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1877601</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 18:13:16 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Has it aged well? on Sat, 02 May 2026 18:13:15 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>NikolajCostas1005</strong> — <em>11 years ago(October 05, 2014 01:17 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I think it's a timeless classic. It takes place in a very specific time but the way it was made doesn't really scream '90s to me.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1877600</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1877600</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 18:13:15 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Has it aged well? on Sat, 02 May 2026 18:13:14 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>IrinaOma</strong> — <em>11 years ago(August 27, 2014 10:52 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Surely!</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1877599</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1877599</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 18:13:14 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Has it aged well? on Sat, 02 May 2026 18:13:13 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>audiopinions</strong> — <em>11 years ago(May 03, 2014 06:54 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I just saw it for the first time ever and I thought it was awesome. As others have said, it was made already "dated" by decades, so the on-screen elements of the '50s felt no more out of place now than they would have in 1997.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1877598</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1877598</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 18:13:13 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Has it aged well? on Sat, 02 May 2026 18:13:12 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>ZakkWyldeMyLittlePony</strong> — <em>11 years ago(April 23, 2014 08:44 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I say yes it has.<br />
RIP<br />
Jeff Hanneman<br />
January 31, 1964-May 2, 2013</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1877597</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1877597</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 18:13:12 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Has it aged well? on Sat, 02 May 2026 18:13:11 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>IMDb User</strong></p>
<p dir="auto">This message has been deleted.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1877596</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1877596</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 18:13:11 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Has it aged well? on Sat, 02 May 2026 18:13:10 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>ecidade</strong> — <em>11 years ago(April 06, 2014 12:08 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I'd say this movie has aged better than "Titanic", which won Best Picture over L.A. Confidential.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1877595</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1877595</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 18:13:10 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Has it aged well? on Sat, 02 May 2026 18:13:09 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>pleymo12345</strong> — <em>12 years ago(February 08, 2014 10:02 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Thanks all for the feedback! Only took me two years to reply <img src="https://filmglance.com/discuss/assets/plugins/nodebb-plugin-emoji/emoji/android/1f604.png?v=8570fb93240" class="not-responsive emoji emoji-android emoji--smile" style="height:23px;width:auto;vertical-align:middle" title=":D" alt="😄" /><br />
I have re-watched it and it was a very pleasant experience <img src="https://filmglance.com/discuss/assets/plugins/nodebb-plugin-emoji/emoji/android/1f642.png?v=8570fb93240" class="not-responsive emoji emoji-android emoji--slightly_smiling_face" style="height:23px;width:auto;vertical-align:middle" title=":)" alt="🙂" /></p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1877594</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1877594</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 18:13:09 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Has it aged well? on Sat, 02 May 2026 18:13:08 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>coolbluegreen</strong> — <em>12 years ago(February 05, 2014 02:00 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">It's aged better than ANYTHING.  Better than wine, better than cheese, I have never seen anything age as well as this film.  We all should age as well. Johnny Depp hasn't aged as well as LA Confidential!</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1877593</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1877593</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 18:13:08 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Has it aged well? on Sat, 02 May 2026 18:13:07 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>joe_538</strong> — <em>12 years ago(February 04, 2014 09:53 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Well, I just saw it for the first time today and loved it. So, yes.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1877592</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1877592</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 18:13:07 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Has it aged well? on Sat, 02 May 2026 18:13:06 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>IMDb User</strong></p>
<p dir="auto">This message has been deleted.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1877591</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1877591</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 18:13:06 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Has it aged well? on Sat, 02 May 2026 18:13:05 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>baelor</strong> — <em>12 years ago(December 24, 2013 11:21 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">So did I!  I was hoping it would be On Demand because it aired kind of late in the night, but it was worth it.  My sister also loved it, even though she normally hates everything about movies like LA Confidential.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1877590</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1877590</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 18:13:05 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Has it aged well? on Sat, 02 May 2026 18:13:03 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>soonerpike697</strong> — <em>12 years ago(December 22, 2013 10:28 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I just watched this on HBO hadn't seen it in years and it's still fantastic<br />
"I do what I say and I say what I mean"</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1877589</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1877589</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 18:13:03 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Has it aged well? on Sat, 02 May 2026 18:13:02 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>voxic</strong> — <em>13 years ago(March 06, 2013 08:58 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">any movie with a great story is worth watching no matter the age. this movie is definitely one of them. and any movie with a surprise ending that you've seen before yet continue to watch over and over again = great.</p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto">We've lost Gorgeous George.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1877588</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1877588</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 18:13:02 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Has it aged well? on Sat, 02 May 2026 18:13:01 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>CCRider01</strong> — <em>11 years ago(August 07, 2014 02:44 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">The film has aged just fine, and does not need a remake with "modern" CGI. There is not exactly a shortage of "shiny" computer graphic reliant films with average acting skills and lack of substance. Keep CGI where it belongs, primarily comic book / super hero, and frivolous action movies.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1877587</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1877587</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 18:13:01 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Has it aged well? on Sat, 02 May 2026 18:13:00 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>IMDb User</strong></p>
<p dir="auto">This message has been deleted.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1877586</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1877586</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 18:13:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Has it aged well? on Sat, 02 May 2026 18:12:59 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Lucy9596</strong> — <em>13 years ago(December 21, 2012 04:35 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">If the idea is to stay alive, I'm driving.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1877585</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1877585</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 18:12:59 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Has it aged well? on Sat, 02 May 2026 18:12:58 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>MyDarkStar</strong> — <em>13 years ago(December 20, 2012 11:00 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">ohhhh, is that why all of the cars, hair, clothes, TV's, songs, stars, and references were from the 50's ? I was wondering about that !<br />
I was really confused when Lana Turner showed up. I thought she from the 50's, not the 90's. I also was confused why the LA freeway hadn't been built yet.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1877584</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1877584</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 18:12:58 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Has it aged well? on Sat, 02 May 2026 18:12:57 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Lucy9596</strong> — <em>13 years ago(December 20, 2012 06:03 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">You're kidding, right?<br />
Storyline<br />
1950's Los Angeles is the seedy backdrop for this intricate noir-ish tale of police corruption and Hollywood sleaze.<br />
If the idea is to stay alive, I'm driving.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1877583</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1877583</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 18:12:57 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Has it aged well? on Sat, 02 May 2026 18:12:56 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>MyDarkStar</strong> — <em>13 years ago(December 20, 2012 05:40 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Hasn't aged well at all. It's only 15yrs old, but all of the cars, suits, and hairstyles look about 60yrs old.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1877582</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1877582</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 18:12:56 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>