<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[my take on it]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Lawn Dogs</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>Bones729</strong> — <em>15 years ago(March 12, 2011 06:36 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">The main thing that bugged me was that the movie didn't seem to know what it wanted to be.  Like it started out as a dark comedy, then became this unusual-friendship sort of drama, and then ended with that really artsy, supernatural finish.  So it was just all over the place.  Maybe take all those elements and blend them better.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/224001/my-take-on-it</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 May 2026 15:20:09 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/224001.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 18:41:50 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to my take on it on Sat, 02 May 2026 18:41:51 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Timescrew</strong> — <em>15 years ago(April 03, 2011 10:40 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Well said. I enjoyed the movie, but had these same thoughts as well.<br />
There is no flavor text!</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1879109</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1879109</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 18:41:51 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>