<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Back in 1997, Titanic was  #11 in top 250!]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Titanic</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>blancolechat</strong> — <em>9 years ago(January 09, 2017 01:50 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Time has passed.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/224489/back-in-1997-titanic-was-11-in-top-250</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 May 2026 17:34:56 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/224489.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 19:57:55 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Back in 1997, Titanic was  #11 in top 250! on Sat, 02 May 2026 19:58:03 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>bull-boy</strong> — <em>1 year ago(December 05, 2024 08:14 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">That's interesting <img src="https://filmglance.com/discuss/assets/plugins/nodebb-plugin-emoji/emoji/android/1f44d.png?v=8570fb93240" class="not-responsive emoji emoji-android emoji--+1" style="height:23px;width:auto;vertical-align:middle" title=":+1:" alt="👍" /></p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1883152</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1883152</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 19:58:03 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Back in 1997, Titanic was  #11 in top 250! on Sat, 02 May 2026 19:58:02 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>peeaecee</strong> — <em>9 years ago(January 21, 2017 02:28 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto"><a href="http://www.timo-schreiter.de/imdb/all_top250_titles.php" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.timo-schreiter.de/imdb/all_top250_titles.php</a><br />
There.  Every movie that has been on the Top 250 (or at least was on long enough to have been recorded).  Knock yourself out.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1883151</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1883151</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 19:58:02 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Back in 1997, Titanic was  #11 in top 250! on Sat, 02 May 2026 19:58:00 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>cc1001</strong> — <em>9 years ago(January 22, 2017 04:34 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">When I joined IMDb in 2003, this movie's rating was 6.9 and remained that way for some time thereafter.<br />
Then it started to slowly inch its way up until the current 7.7.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1883150</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1883150</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 19:58:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Back in 1997, Titanic was  #11 in top 250! on Sat, 02 May 2026 19:57:59 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>navtej_kps</strong> — <em>9 years ago(January 20, 2017 11:22 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">what was rating then? when i voted few years back it was 7.1</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1883149</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1883149</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 19:57:59 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Back in 1997, Titanic was  #11 in top 250! on Sat, 02 May 2026 19:57:58 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>saikano_75</strong> — <em>9 years ago(January 17, 2017 12:42 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I guess those numbers were good back then<br />
Little Mikey Myers that lived across the street.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1883148</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1883148</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 19:57:58 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Back in 1997, Titanic was  #11 in top 250! on Sat, 02 May 2026 19:57:57 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>lukemm-90850</strong> — <em>9 years ago(January 13, 2017 03:34 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">At least in Russia, they weren't so weak-minded that they let any backlash detour them from enjoying this masterpiece.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1883147</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1883147</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 19:57:57 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Back in 1997, Titanic was  #11 in top 250! on Sat, 02 May 2026 19:57:56 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>shushkka</strong> — <em>9 years ago(January 12, 2017 08:11 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">In Russia there is a similar site to IMDB called Kinopoisk and there Titanic is currently number 44 in top 250. And it's been in top 250 ever since the movie came out.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1883146</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1883146</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 19:57:56 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>