<![CDATA[Time has passed.]]>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Titanic

blancolechat — 9 years ago(January 09, 2017 01:50 PM)

Time has passed.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/224490/time-has-passedRSS for NodeTue, 12 May 2026 20:55:29 GMTSat, 02 May 2026 19:58:04 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to Time has passed. on Sat, 02 May 2026 19:58:12 GMT]]>bull-boy — 1 year ago(December 05, 2024 08:14 AM)

That's interesting 👍

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1883160https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1883160Sat, 02 May 2026 19:58:12 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Time has passed. on Sat, 02 May 2026 19:58:11 GMT]]>peeaecee — 9 years ago(January 21, 2017 02:28 PM)

http://www.timo-schreiter.de/imdb/all_top250_titles.php
There. Every movie that has been on the Top 250 (or at least was on long enough to have been recorded). Knock yourself out.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1883159https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1883159Sat, 02 May 2026 19:58:11 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Time has passed. on Sat, 02 May 2026 19:58:10 GMT]]>cc1001 — 9 years ago(January 22, 2017 04:34 AM)

When I joined IMDb in 2003, this movie's rating was 6.9 and remained that way for some time thereafter.
Then it started to slowly inch its way up until the current 7.7.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1883158https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1883158Sat, 02 May 2026 19:58:10 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Time has passed. on Sat, 02 May 2026 19:58:09 GMT]]>navtej_kps — 9 years ago(January 20, 2017 11:22 PM)

what was rating then? when i voted few years back it was 7.1

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1883157https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1883157Sat, 02 May 2026 19:58:09 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Time has passed. on Sat, 02 May 2026 19:58:08 GMT]]>saikano_75 — 9 years ago(January 17, 2017 12:42 PM)

I guess those numbers were good back then
Little Mikey Myers that lived across the street.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1883156https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1883156Sat, 02 May 2026 19:58:08 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Time has passed. on Sat, 02 May 2026 19:58:06 GMT]]>lukemm-90850 — 9 years ago(January 13, 2017 03:34 AM)

At least in Russia, they weren't so weak-minded that they let any backlash detour them from enjoying this masterpiece.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1883155https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1883155Sat, 02 May 2026 19:58:06 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Time has passed. on Sat, 02 May 2026 19:58:05 GMT]]>shushkka — 9 years ago(January 12, 2017 08:11 AM)

In Russia there is a similar site to IMDB called Kinopoisk and there Titanic is currently number 44 in top 250. And it's been in top 250 ever since the movie came out.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1883154https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1883154Sat, 02 May 2026 19:58:05 GMT