<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Bio-mechanical horror is actually quite rare in the states. This one goes above and beyond in the practical FX departmen]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Virus</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>Lightman42</strong> — <em>9 years ago(January 02, 2017 01:53 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Bio-mechanical horror is actually quite rare in the states. This one goes above and beyond in the practical FX department, the cast is actually quite good, and the film is all around well produced. Definitely suffers from feeling a bit generic and derivative in tone, but a lot of that is made up for in the full on celebration of bio-mechanical horror (with well placed and saldom CG) that just keeps elevating to new heights throughout the movie. It's gotten better with age.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/224581/bio-mechanical-horror-is-actually-quite-rare-in-the-states-this-one-goes-above-and-beyond-in-the-practical-fx-departmen</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 May 2026 22:30:20 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/224581.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 20:12:38 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl></channel></rss>