<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Nice special effects for a 10+ year old movie.]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Virus</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>jabronie75</strong> — <em>15 years ago(December 02, 2010 05:13 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I thought the robots/cyborgs looked great. Much better than the all CGI crap they shove down everybody's throats these days.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/224656/nice-special-effects-for-a-10-year-old-movie</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 May 2026 21:05:56 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/224656.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 20:22:17 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Nice special effects for a 10+ year old movie. on Sat, 02 May 2026 20:22:18 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>grrrdevin</strong> — <em>14 years ago(September 05, 2011 07:25 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">The CG in this even looked better than most these days.<br />
"I've been living on toxic waste for years, and I'm<br />
fine.<br />
Just ask my other heads!"</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1884429</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1884429</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 20:22:18 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>