<![CDATA[Aged remarkably well]]>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — A Night at the Roxbury

userrrrr — 11 years ago(October 17, 2014 12:14 AM)

I can't think of any other SNL skit based movies that have stood the test of time as much as this one. It's not a great movie by any means but the humor still works, it's shot well, the acting is good enough for what it is. I'm glad I still have the vhs.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/225096/aged-remarkably-wellRSS for NodeWed, 13 May 2026 07:04:45 GMTSat, 02 May 2026 21:31:04 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to Aged remarkably well on Sat, 02 May 2026 21:31:07 GMT]]>SpaceMountainMike — 10 years ago(March 21, 2016 05:32 PM)

Coneheads! I don't know if it's better than Night At THe Roxbury because I haven't seen the latter yet I rented it so I'm going to watch it tonight.

My iMDB profile
http://www.imdb.com/board/24297325/?ref_=fn_al_nm_1

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1888059https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1888059Sat, 02 May 2026 21:31:07 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Aged remarkably well on Sat, 02 May 2026 21:31:06 GMT]]>TheBeardedWonder — 10 years ago(November 24, 2015 08:00 PM)

Macgruber is only like 4-5 years old man, gotta wait at least a decade to see if a movie 'holds up well' I think.And I also agree this one did age better than expected. I expected it to be very much a remnant of it's time, but the comedy isn't old or stale. Most of the jokes could come out in a movie today and they would work.
In just a couple years it will be 2 decades old. Now that's crazy.
'Get yourself a real dog. Any dog under 50 lbs is a cat and cats are pointless' - Ron Swanson

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1888058https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1888058Sat, 02 May 2026 21:31:06 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Aged remarkably well on Sat, 02 May 2026 21:31:05 GMT]]>nateaguerra — 10 years ago(August 13, 2015 11:32 AM)

Macgruber?

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1888057https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1888057Sat, 02 May 2026 21:31:05 GMT