<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[One henchman to guard the van?]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Rush Hour</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>Quaritch</strong> — <em>12 years ago(August 30, 2013 11:28 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Juntao, after putting all this time and effort into gathering up every explosive in L.A. and kidnapping Concul Han's daughter, has finally played his hand and is going to get his 70 million in exchange for the girl but decides to leave one guy to guard the van holding his only bargaining chip? Nitpicking yes but this bothers me every time I watch this fantastic movie. I just don't understad why, especially in this situation, why he would have one sole henchmen guarding the girl. At least have a few guys in the van watching her or something.<br />
"This isn't Vietnam, we have rules here."</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/225293/one-henchman-to-guard-the-van</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 May 2026 07:33:09 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/225293.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 22:03:52 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to One henchman to guard the van? on Sat, 02 May 2026 22:04:01 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Arvin-G-Borkar</strong> — <em>9 years ago(July 23, 2016 11:36 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Minute details were not paid attention to.<br />
Another scene was in the beginning where Jackie Chan has the main anatagonist within gun point and calls for back up. Then it takes the cops like 15 minutes to get where he is at. Not only this, but they have their sirens blaring. If the guy was that big of a criminal in Hong Kong, why not have undecover cops with Jackie Chan to arrest him?<br />
Even in reality I wonder this. There will be a criminal on the lose and the cops will come with sirens blaring. If they were undercover, they probably would get a lot more done.<br />
RIO OLYMPICS!!!! August 5th!</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1889803</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1889803</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 22:04:01 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to One henchman to guard the van? on Sat, 02 May 2026 22:04:00 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Totemkauf</strong> — <em>10 years ago(April 30, 2015 02:39 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">But there could have , and<br />
should<br />
have been a few more gaurds inside the van. The only thing more conspicuous than a parked van is a parked van with some dude pacing around in front of it smoking.<br />
Perhaps it shows how his cowardace was greater than his plan's perfection. He would rather have as many of the guys inside with him than have extra people outside where they couldn't protect him.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1889802</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1889802</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 22:04:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to One henchman to guard the van? on Sat, 02 May 2026 22:03:59 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Tasgo</strong> — <em>11 years ago(April 27, 2014 10:00 PM)</em></p>
<ol>
<li>Perhaps to make it less obvious having a bunch of men around the van. Nobody knew what kind of vehicle the girl was kept in.</li>
<li>Drive 10 miles away or take it to a "radio proof" room? Technicalities aside here (devices can be detonated from over 10 miles away). And while attempting transit to said "radio proof" room the said henchman probably had to constantly report in. And lastly, it's Carter. Does any of what you suggest sound anything  he would do?</li>
</ol>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1889801</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1889801</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 22:03:59 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to One henchman to guard the van? on Sat, 02 May 2026 22:03:57 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>mikeyg24</strong> — <em>11 years ago(July 11, 2014 10:00 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Well this is mere speculation but it would have made sense for the vest to have a proximity trigger precisely so that someone couldn't make off with the girl.<br />
There's a moral to this story Del Boy but for the life of me I can't find it!</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1889800</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1889800</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 22:03:57 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to One henchman to guard the van? on Sat, 02 May 2026 22:03:56 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Nikon11</strong> — <em>12 years ago(April 03, 2014 05:12 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Yeah, well that, and it's<br />
Rush Hour</p>
<ul>
<li>so we're not really supposed to put a lot of deep thought into it.  Not that I don't love the movie - I do - just realise what it is.</li>
</ul>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1889799</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1889799</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 22:03:56 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to One henchman to guard the van? on Sat, 02 May 2026 22:03:55 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Quaritch</strong> — <em>12 years ago(April 01, 2014 12:55 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Yeah exactly! Why even risk keeping her around so close? Like you said the trigger can't have that long a range so driving her off to a good distance would have been the safer bet. But then again, wouldn't be as exciting I guess lol<br />
"This isn't Vietnam, we have rules here."</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1889798</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1889798</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 22:03:55 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to One henchman to guard the van? on Sat, 02 May 2026 22:03:54 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Nikon11</strong> — <em>12 years ago(March 31, 2014 07:54 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Ha, yeah, well, he never intended to mention that they had the girl parked in a van right outside the hotel - just kind of slipped out.<br />
Also, I wondered why he couldn't have just driven off, out of range of the switch.  I'm guessing ten miles, or so - or bring her to the station or somewhere they might have a radio-proof room, or something like that.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1889797</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1889797</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 22:03:54 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>