<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Why this lost the Best Picture Oscar.]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Saving Private Ryan</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>powermandan</strong> — <em>10 years ago(October 10, 2015 07:47 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I do agree that this should have won the Oscar for best picture of 1998. This was far better than Shakespeare In Love. But I did some analyzing and here are the reasons (I think) SPR lost. (These are mostly reasons why )<br />
-Saving Private Ryan is extremely brutal and violent. You can understand why some Academy members would not vote for this. But that didn't stop them from Braveheart or Platoon!<br />
-Saving Private Ryan has no complexity. It is just a simple, straight-forward story of a platoon trying to capture a private. Despite being amazing as heck, this had one of the weakest stories of the year.<br />
-Thin Red Line. Thin Red Line is another WWII epic from 1998 that rivalled Saving Private Ryan. Twin movies like these are always feuding. It wouldn't have been fair to award won but not the other.<br />
-Shakespeare In Love was worthy of winning the gold. If Saving Private Ryan did not come out in 1998, Shakespeare In Love would have been a very worthy winner.<br />
-Shakespeare In Love has more to it. Despite Saving Private Ryan begin better, Shakespeare In Love had the better dialogue, better music, a wider range of emotions, stronger character development, better sets, better costumes, awesome allusions.<br />
-Look at how many WWII movies came out before Saving Private Ryan that won the gold. Look at how many Shakespeare movies have won the gold.<br />
-It is rare for the Best Picture and Best Director Oscars to go out to different films. While Saving Private Ryan was easily the hardest film to make, voters wanted Shakespeare In Love to take something home too.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/225369/why-this-lost-the-best-picture-oscar</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 May 2026 21:20:52 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/225369.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 22:14:04 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Why this lost the Best Picture Oscar. on Sat, 02 May 2026 22:14:58 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>IMDb User</strong></p>
<p dir="auto">This message has been deleted.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1890391</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1890391</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 22:14:58 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Why this lost the Best Picture Oscar. on Sat, 02 May 2026 22:14:57 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Ricardo-36</strong> — <em>9 years ago(November 17, 2016 08:01 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">It lost because it was originally released during summer, as opposed to the more viable release window of late December for Oscar bait films. By the time the voting began, people had forgot about it.<br />
Also, Spielberg had won an Oscar for another WW2-related film (Schindler's List) only 5 years prior, and that was a superior film.<br />
"You keep him in here, and make sure HE doesn't leave!"</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1890390</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1890390</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 22:14:57 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Why this lost the Best Picture Oscar. on Sat, 02 May 2026 22:14:56 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>shanayneigh</strong> — <em>9 years ago(October 09, 2016 07:47 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">The technical achievement of this movie was great. But the story was pretty pedestrian. I can see why it didn't win best movie.<br />
Not that I'm the biggest fan of Shakespeare in Love. I didn't particularly like any of the 1999 nominees for best picture.<br />
Working in the movie business since -92</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1890389</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1890389</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 22:14:56 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Why this lost the Best Picture Oscar. on Sat, 02 May 2026 22:14:55 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>BettyX</strong> — <em>9 years ago(January 20, 2017 10:37 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Who the f* loves war?<br />
Im more humble than you can understand-Donnie</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1890388</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1890388</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 22:14:55 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Why this lost the Best Picture Oscar. on Sat, 02 May 2026 22:14:54 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>NeilNR</strong> — <em>9 years ago(November 13, 2016 11:28 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Your original list is awesome.  But I refused to see The Hurt Locker because of the camera work.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1890387</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1890387</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 22:14:54 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Why this lost the Best Picture Oscar. on Sat, 02 May 2026 22:14:53 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>nocomputer1962</strong> — <em>9 years ago(November 08, 2016 08:11 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">To recap, my list accidentally omitted The Hurt Locker (2009), released 11 years after Saving Private Ryan.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1890386</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1890386</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 22:14:53 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Why this lost the Best Picture Oscar. on Sat, 02 May 2026 22:14:51 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>indy_go_blue44</strong> — <em>9 years ago(October 27, 2016 09:50 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Wings 1927<br />
All Quiet on the Western Front 1930<br />
Best Years of Our Lives 1946<br />
From Here to Eternity 1953<br />
Bridge on the River Kwai 1957<br />
Lawrence of Arabia 1962<br />
Patton 1970<br />
Deer Hunter 1978<br />
Platoon 1986<br />
Saving Private Ryan 1998<br />
Seems like the libs haven't done much for the past 30 years.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1890385</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1890385</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 22:14:51 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Why this lost the Best Picture Oscar. on Sat, 02 May 2026 22:14:50 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>nocomputer1962</strong> — <em>9 years ago(October 09, 2016 08:51 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Dang, how did I forget the Hurt Locker?  That one really really would have shot movieman's argument to hell.   Good catch.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1890384</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1890384</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 22:14:50 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Why this lost the Best Picture Oscar. on Sat, 02 May 2026 22:14:49 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Musashi94</strong> — <em>9 years ago(October 08, 2016 12:39 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I wouldn't take anything Movieman says too seriously.<br />
Oh and you forgot The Hurt Locker.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1890383</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1890383</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 22:14:49 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Why this lost the Best Picture Oscar. on Sat, 02 May 2026 22:14:48 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>nocomputer1962</strong> — <em>9 years ago(October 06, 2016 05:52 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Somebody forgot to tell the liberals not to vote for Best Picture winners Platoon, Patton, Bridge on the River Kwai, From Here to Eternity, Best Years of our Lives, The Deer Hunter, Lawrence of Arabia, Wings, and All Quiet on the Western Front</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1890382</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1890382</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 22:14:48 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Why this lost the Best Picture Oscar. on Sat, 02 May 2026 22:14:47 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>nospar122</strong> — <em>9 years ago(September 26, 2016 09:27 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Your beanie is missing its propeller.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1890381</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1890381</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 22:14:47 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Why this lost the Best Picture Oscar. on Sat, 02 May 2026 22:14:46 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>MoviemanCin</strong> — <em>9 years ago(September 26, 2016 08:23 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Because it's true, numb nuts. Also Shakespeare probably had a better media campaign.<br />
Schrodinger's cat walks into a bar and doesn't.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1890380</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1890380</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 22:14:46 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Why this lost the Best Picture Oscar. on Sat, 02 May 2026 22:14:45 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>nospar122</strong> — <em>9 years ago(September 26, 2016 11:08 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">That's why so many war movies get made, right? Why must every argument come down to political bloviating? What an idiotic statement.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1890379</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1890379</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 22:14:45 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Why this lost the Best Picture Oscar. on Sat, 02 May 2026 22:14:44 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>MoviemanCin</strong> — <em>9 years ago(September 26, 2016 06:12 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Simple.<br />
It lost because Hollywood is composed mostly of liberals who hate war (even noble ones like WW II) and who hate the military.<br />
Schrodinger's cat walks into a bar and doesn't.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1890378</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1890378</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 22:14:44 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Why this lost the Best Picture Oscar. on Sat, 02 May 2026 22:14:43 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>generationofswine</strong> — <em>9 years ago(June 09, 2016 08:35 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">No complexity?  You're kidding me.  Saving Private Ryan is the best pro-soldier/anti-war movie ever made.  It walks that thin red line better than it's WWII rival could ever dream of.<br />
"Few people understand the psychology of dealing with a highway traffic cop."</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1890377</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1890377</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 22:14:43 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Why this lost the Best Picture Oscar. on Sat, 02 May 2026 22:14:42 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>donluigi87</strong> — <em>9 years ago(June 08, 2016 02:49 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I think 2 war films being up 4 best picture split the vote allowing Shakespeare In Love to win best picture.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1890376</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1890376</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 22:14:42 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Why this lost the Best Picture Oscar. on Sat, 02 May 2026 22:14:41 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>xmonn</strong> — <em>9 years ago(May 27, 2016 01:23 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I have to say I have a bias towards SPR. I think it's the greatest war movie ever made.<br />
That said I thought SIL sucked. I tried watching it three times and only hated it more with each viewing. It's one of the most overrated Best Picture winners ever.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1890375</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1890375</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 22:14:41 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Why this lost the Best Picture Oscar. on Sat, 02 May 2026 22:14:40 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>mtlddrms</strong> — <em>10 years ago(March 17, 2016 05:01 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Yeah, but which of the two films is well-remembered and constantly shown on television over the years?</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1890374</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1890374</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 22:14:40 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Why this lost the Best Picture Oscar. on Sat, 02 May 2026 22:14:38 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>coolbrett</strong> — <em>9 years ago(April 08, 2016 05:47 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">It isn't his flashback. It was just showing one scene from when Ryan was an old man and then the WWII story begins. But yeah it is confusing cos it sets it up as if it is his flashback, and Tom Hanks is his younger self. But then he becomes Matt Damon by the end haha. They should have set that up differently.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1890373</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1890373</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 22:14:38 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Why this lost the Best Picture Oscar. on Sat, 02 May 2026 22:14:37 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>nocomputer1962</strong> — <em>9 years ago(April 07, 2016 07:44 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">The writing is a little sloppy for a Best Picture nominee.   If you think about it,  the entire movie is a flashback of a character who isn't even in the first half of his own flashback!</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1890372</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1890372</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 22:14:37 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Why this lost the Best Picture Oscar. on Sat, 02 May 2026 22:14:36 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>coolbrett</strong> — <em>10 years ago(January 12, 2016 11:04 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">You may be right about the writing of it. If it wasn't so well directed and acted, it would just be a shoot-em-up, bloodbath WWII movie aimed at teenagers. But Spielberg put so much into it that it became the most realistic depiction of World War II in movies, and it was a way of honouring what the vets went through. So I think it very much deserved the best director Oscar, but I can see why they didn't choose to award it best picture.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1890371</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1890371</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 22:14:36 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Why this lost the Best Picture Oscar. on Sat, 02 May 2026 22:14:35 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>justanicknamed</strong> — <em>10 years ago(January 15, 2016 07:13 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Have you gotten fitted for your Oscar gown yet?  Or are you still boycotting the show because they aren't giving enough love to Caitlyn Jenner for you.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1890370</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1890370</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 22:14:35 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Why this lost the Best Picture Oscar. on Sat, 02 May 2026 22:14:34 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>IMDb User</strong></p>
<p dir="auto">This message has been deleted.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1890369</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1890369</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 22:14:34 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Why this lost the Best Picture Oscar. on Sat, 02 May 2026 22:14:33 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>joed1667</strong> — <em>10 years ago(January 14, 2016 11:09 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">ROTFLMAO - Still trying, aren't you. You just can't let it go. GTFU, you're like a little kid who someone kicked some sand in their face!</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1890368</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1890368</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 22:14:33 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>