<![CDATA[South Park should have been impirtal to the election]]>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — South Park

jemt3000 — 9 years ago(November 11, 2016 08:31 AM)

I don't mind it being controversial but delcaring the candidate you support and making multiple episodes into bashing the other candidate is a little to far

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/225734/south-park-should-have-been-impirtal-to-the-electionRSS for NodeFri, 15 May 2026 20:30:01 GMTSat, 02 May 2026 23:03:27 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to South Park should have been impirtal to the election on Sat, 02 May 2026 23:03:46 GMT]]>ZakkWyldeMyLittlePony — 9 years ago(November 13, 2016 11:23 AM)

Bashing Donald Trump is so funny though 🙂
Eric Clapton, Jimmy Page, and Pete Townshend watch My Little Pony: Friendship Is Magic

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1892932https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1892932Sat, 02 May 2026 23:03:46 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to South Park should have been impirtal to the election on Sat, 02 May 2026 23:03:45 GMT]]>Mr_Nyar — 9 years ago(November 13, 2016 09:33 AM)

Wait, what? They treated Hillary as a brain dead automaton that just do what she's told.
I think there is a difference between a work of art and an Oscar.
Roger Corman

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1892931https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1892931Sat, 02 May 2026 23:03:45 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to South Park should have been impirtal to the election on Sat, 02 May 2026 23:03:44 GMT]]>Electrical1 — 9 years ago(November 12, 2016 04:11 PM)

it's disappointing. They've given Hillary a free pass
Yeah, she's such a 'Turd Sandwich' If only South Park had the balls to call her that.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1892930https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1892930Sat, 02 May 2026 23:03:44 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to South Park should have been impirtal to the election on Sat, 02 May 2026 23:03:43 GMT]]>Sluggr-3 — 9 years ago(November 12, 2016 01:06 PM)

A lot of comedians have signed the death warrant to their careers. I pretty much stopped watching The Daily Show after 2008 and even though I never really started to watch Colbert on CBS, I have no desire to after the sad pathetic b*ht speech he gave on his election special. It is sad that so many of them are unable to see the fascists they were backing (BTW, not much difference between fascism and political correctness if you are paying attention). Hopefully some of them will see what they were doing. I do know that a number of people in Portland that I chat with are starting to realize that CNN and MSNBC are not impartial news sources as they claim. One should look to the news for truth, not just for statements that they agree with. And even "the fake news" is no longer reliable in this regard. A lot of Hollywood people shot their mouths off hoping they'd be given a night in the Lincoln bedroom as a reward. I think unintended consequences is what the future holds for them.
My Chimp DNA seems to have lost its password temporarily. Sluggr-2

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1892929https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1892929Sat, 02 May 2026 23:03:43 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to South Park should have been impirtal to the election on Sat, 02 May 2026 23:03:42 GMT]]>Final_Hitokiri — 9 years ago(November 12, 2016 05:13 AM)

Yep. Sad day for South Park

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1892928https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1892928Sat, 02 May 2026 23:03:42 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to South Park should have been impirtal to the election on Sat, 02 May 2026 23:03:40 GMT]]>verycoolnin — 9 years ago(November 11, 2016 05:55 PM)

Trey Parker started drinking the Hollywood kool-aide.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1892927https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1892927Sat, 02 May 2026 23:03:40 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to South Park should have been impirtal to the election on Sat, 02 May 2026 23:03:39 GMT]]>retrorick — 9 years ago(November 11, 2016 04:40 PM)

it's disappointing. They've given Hillary a free pass

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1892926https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1892926Sat, 02 May 2026 23:03:39 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to South Park should have been impirtal to the election on Sat, 02 May 2026 23:03:38 GMT]]>maxLevelkook — 9 years ago(November 11, 2016 03:00 PM)

Trump was not a normal candidate, I don't see how they couldn't do something like this.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1892925https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1892925Sat, 02 May 2026 23:03:38 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to South Park should have been impirtal to the election on Sat, 02 May 2026 23:03:37 GMT]]>/.ㅤ — 1 year ago(September 29, 2024 02:13 AM)

south park sux?
My password is password.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1892924https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1892924Sat, 02 May 2026 23:03:37 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to South Park should have been impirtal to the election on Sat, 02 May 2026 23:03:35 GMT]]>/.ㅤ — 1 year ago(September 29, 2024 01:08 AM)

Kys for bumping this.
My password is password.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1892923https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1892923Sat, 02 May 2026 23:03:35 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to South Park should have been impirtal to the election on Sat, 02 May 2026 23:03:34 GMT]]>/.ㅤ — 1 year ago(September 29, 2024 12:40 AM)

🤣
My password is password.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1892922https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1892922Sat, 02 May 2026 23:03:34 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to South Park should have been impirtal to the election on Sat, 02 May 2026 23:03:33 GMT]]>centauri2014 — 9 years ago(November 11, 2016 02:50 PM)

Donald? Is that you?
Ladies and gentlemenMr.Conway Twitty

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1892921https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1892921Sat, 02 May 2026 23:03:33 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to South Park should have been impirtal to the election on Sat, 02 May 2026 23:03:32 GMT]]>tambourine_man — 9 years ago(November 11, 2016 01:19 PM)

Moron.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1892920https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1892920Sat, 02 May 2026 23:03:32 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to South Park should have been impirtal to the election on Sat, 02 May 2026 23:03:30 GMT]]>solmaquina — 9 years ago(November 11, 2016 10:51 AM)

They've never remained impartial about things that matter to them in the past. Why on Earth would they keep quiet if they have an opinion now?
And I don't think it's particularly controversial to voice distaste for Trump. Or at least, if it is, it's fair to say that he started the controversy and brought it on himself.
Movie sequels podcast:
www.facebook.com/diminishingreturnspodcast

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1892919https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1892919Sat, 02 May 2026 23:03:30 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to South Park should have been impirtal to the election on Sat, 02 May 2026 23:03:29 GMT]]>solmaquina — 9 years ago(November 11, 2016 10:50 AM)

They don't want to use Donald Trump. That's why they used Garrison in the first place. They've openly stated that they don't think he deserves the satisfaction of being on South Park.
Movie sequels podcast:
www.facebook.com/diminishingreturnspodcast

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1892918https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1892918Sat, 02 May 2026 23:03:29 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to South Park should have been impirtal to the election on Sat, 02 May 2026 23:03:28 GMT]]>Final_Hitokiri — 9 years ago(November 11, 2016 09:14 AM)

I don't think they ever thought Donald would make it this far.
Last year, they had Garrison just kind of going off of Donald's claims and a lot changed from November of 2015 and September of 2016 when the show was on hiatus.
They should have refocused, and not had the election be the primary storyline. It's been a disaster. And now they can't even use Donald Trump, since Garrison is the character.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1892917https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1892917Sat, 02 May 2026 23:03:28 GMT