<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Woman who took &quot;chance&quot; pic with Hillary in woods was another stunt]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — The View</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>Dengal</strong> — <em>9 years ago(November 12, 2016 12:25 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Margot Gerster, the heartbroken mother who was taking a hike with her daughter, and just happened to run into Hillary. She got a photo with the former first lady, posted a story about meeting Hillary on facebook, and the MSM couldn't stop talking about.<br />
Of course, like with everything dealing with Hilary, this was total BS. Margot Gerster already had photos with Hillary on her facebook, she worked on Hillary's campaign. It wasn't a chance meeting. The facebook post has since been deleted, and Gerster's facebook has been set to private.<br />
Did find it kinda fishy that the women who constantly needed help going up steps would be out on a hike in the middle of the woods on her day off after a 2 yr campaign.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/226294/woman-who-took-chance-pic-with-hillary-in-woods-was-another-stunt</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 May 2026 15:59:01 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/226294.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2026 00:29:51 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Woman who took &quot;chance&quot; pic with Hillary in woods was another stunt on Sun, 03 May 2026 00:29:55 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>JamesAvalon</strong> — <em>9 years ago(November 12, 2016 03:58 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Hillary hiking? Really? Yeah, that has bull$hit written all over it.<br />
Liberals have a REAL hard time being honest.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1897326</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1897326</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2026 00:29:55 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Woman who took &quot;chance&quot; pic with Hillary in woods was another stunt on Sun, 03 May 2026 00:29:54 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>A_l_a_c_h_u_a_1</strong> — <em>9 years ago(November 12, 2016 03:13 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I smelled that the very instance I saw that storyIt seemed way too convenient and perfect</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1897325</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1897325</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2026 00:29:54 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Woman who took &quot;chance&quot; pic with Hillary in woods was another stunt on Sun, 03 May 2026 00:29:52 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>pjpurple-1</strong> — <em>9 years ago(November 12, 2016 03:03 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">"A photo stunt with the Clintons"??? Imagine!  Reminds me of the vacation photo of the "happy couple" having that impromptu "dance" on a secluded beach. Remember after Bill got caught with his trousers down?  They were on vacation and were overcome with emotion, dancing on the beach with no musicyeah,right.<br />
I doubt if those two take a dump without taking a poll first. What would be the "best" time?<br />
Facts are not liberals strong suit. Rhetoric is.  Thomas Sowell</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1897324</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1897324</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2026 00:29:52 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>