They could've just called it, "I Still Know" or "I Still Know What You Did That Summer" but something about having the full title/original with Still added, sounded better to them I guess.

Yes, that title sounds stupid, although I don't think people were seriously suggesting that should've been the actual title. But I don't really agree with this title either, as it's not entirely correct. Not that the title matters anyway, it's the movie itself that's pretty bad.

It's only confusing if you have a simple brain. I Know What You Did Two Summers Ago sounds stupid and doesn't sound as interesting as the one they went with.

A lot of people seem to think that because he "still knows", he's referring to the summer from the first title. I remember when the movie came out, people were saying that it should've been called "I know what you did two summers ago". So it is kind of confusing. Using "again" instead of "still" would be more correct since it doesn't refer to the same event. And I just think it's a silly title. Instead of looking for a contrived variation on the title they could've just called it IKWYDLS 2. But whatever, a silly title for a silly movie, I guess.

It says that because he is still alive and because the story is continuing, that he still knows. Pretty basic, no need to overthink it.

You don't think that's possible? I think it's a dumb title because it's silly, contrived and confusing. There must've been better titles to use.

*Explains why the title makes sense
*Calls it dumb anyway

He means that he hasn't died, so the state of him knowing what happened the previous summer continues. But yes, it's a ridiculous title.

He could have forgotten