No. Not at all.
So many stories, so little time.

Sure.
"Once more, Ackbar will rule the Galaxy, and… we shall have Peace."

YES, and I've been watching you! Frankly I find it disgusting what you do when you're alone!
The validity of my answers is highly dependent on the intelligence of the question..or lack thereof.

David Icke, who has researched this kind of stuff for 26 years, says this movie is amazingly close to true reality. Catch him on YouTube and prepare to have your mind blown.

defining reality

Figured I was just made up. Thanks.

You don't exist.

Could be true, but am I sure of that?

I don't think the Matrix deals with solipsism.

http://www.imdb.com/list/bYs2wu8iWNY/

Yes, you are all living in a simulated reality - my reality. It only exists in my head and I made all of you up.
Sometimes I ask people if they like my reality, but I am just talking to myself anyhow and the answers make no sense.
If you are wondering what will happen when I die, my reality will go to the same place bubbles go when they pop.
When I first read this post I thought "I should have said that' but I already had. Again.
My reality has a lot of holes in it - sorry, I think it is because I was just made up in someone else's head and don't actually exist.

Statistically speaking, probably!

Reasoning: There will always only be one real reality.
This is a false statement. It seems right to you, but it is only the opinion of a human mind. There is surely much that we don't know and even more that we can never know. We are trapped in the limited perspective of an evolved ape and can't go beyond that.

Better is a very relative term. What if we actually are in a simulation and the true reality is that you are the last living creature in the universe who is on a spaceship slowly getting sucked into a black hole and living out your last few weeks living in a simulator and posting on IMDB? That would make things seem pretty good here.
Also, look at all the popular video games that sell well. Most involve a lot of action and exciting stuff that isnt very utopia like.

Damn your point is valid. I could argue against that of course but then we could go on like that, what if, what if, what if
I still believe this is "real" though, as in necessary and that our history will be remembered, still just a step on the way though towards creating heaven which is the real goal. I guess I believe that cause it makes the story better.
I believe in God myself. And I would have to argue why he set it up like this just as a scientist in control of a simulation. I reason it is cause a reality founded on logical relationships can be considered good. We ultimately like order, cause and effect. We don't like when things just happen out of the blue, as you say we would become skeptic and couldn't trust our own existence maybe? I reason a stable foundation is built from the ground up. From nothing to chaos, to order in galaxies and star systems, to life, to man, to culture, faith and love. Maybe God is restricted, maybe "this" is needed to foster emphatic understanding free spirited individuals. If we consider it as a simulation, a mere dream, that we later wake up in paradise from (which I believe we all will) I believe the dream was to teach us empathy and understanding. I really can't know the creators ultimate motives but I believe in what is good, love, evolution, progress and the written word that rings true in me.

RockerJohnny: Well, we don't know what the programmers/scientists want with their project! Maybe its point is to build a program that does evolution as efficiently as possible. Maybe it's about trying to make the inhabitants as intelligent as possible, while still not having them realize that they are artificial. In that case, maybe they introduce "believable" solutions to potential disasters, because if they just pressed the "let's have only 1% get pregnant", we humans would wonder what the heck is going on.
All just speculation of course.

If it is a simulation variables can just be changed. Why not then set the probability of conceiving a child to 1% and we'd have no overpopulation problems. Virus and bacteria is an important part of nature and such needed in a real world and their evolved cousins that cause severe afflictions are a "side effect". In a simulation however we wouldn't need these viruses and with a low prob of conceiving children we could beep around as we'd please. I mean if I made a simulation I make it awesome and pleasureable. If I'd make a new universe, logically founded reality i would understand the nred for viruses and evolution.

RockerJohnny: The viruses and diseases might just have evolved by itself, just like everything else. UNLESS of course they were coded in to keep the population low. Which would make a lot of sense. "Ooops, those humans are overpopulating the planet very quickly! Better introduce a disease to slow down the pace."

However likely due to statistic theory if we look at what we got I think most can agree a better simulation could easily be achieved. To much imperfection and hardship here to argue that someone set it up just like so on purpose, then they must like to revel in our toiling and suffering. Why code in virus and diseases as an example?

You know, LOGICALLY it's more likely that we're in a simulated reality than in the real reality.
Reasoning: There will always only be
one
real reality. But at some point, humans or other creatures are bound to create advanced simulated worlds, much more so than the WoW simulated realities we have with today's primitive technology. (Most of the worlds will probably be inhabited by AI's though, and not real-life creatures connected to from the outside.)
So, maybe we live on a fake Earth, made by humans from 2300, or maybe the scientists who made our world are some for us unimaginary creatures! We can't really know, yet.
Point is, when looking at the numbers, there will be lots of simulated worlds and only one real world, making it more likely we're in one of the simulated ones.

Why, sure ! Its called internet.
A gentleman will not insult me, and no man not a gentleman can insult me.

If it was, the programmer did a beep job.
I think a world that cannot be trusted is though, cause in the end you can and should only trust yourself.

"Are we really living in a simulated reality?"
Maybe. There is no way we can know whether or not reality is, in fact, real.
In fact, today could be a simulation, and our entire history could be implanted memories. Could be that the entire universe is a computer simulation that is only a day old, and all our memories are simply implanted memories (like in
Blade Runner
, that one female replicant who "remembered" her past, but her past didn't exist). Ultimately, what we think of reality is taken on faith, not just by the religious, but by everyone.

I always thought it would be the other way around: the digital projection of your mental self.

It's from the movie
Morpheus explains to Neo, during his first time jacking-in after being freed, that his image is the mental projection of his digital self.