<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[FlashBack]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — The Matrix</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>bigbadwolf666</strong> — <em>4 years ago(July 03, 2021 03:24 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">As I watched it was so weird. The HD really didnt do it justice as you can see artifacts and things you couldnt see before like bad make up. Though still a classic and the best adventure movie all-time the HD didnt really capture it's awesomeness. For some reason the movie was much better in the theaters which I saw three times. It felt like you were Neo and you were doing the Bullet time and speed motions. It's definitely a theater movie and probably the best Theater movie of all-time. I almost feel it should be much longer which is why it's good that it has sequels. There was several aspects and contradictions though but still a great philosophical debate. I cant believe there was a lot of different actors for these roles when I can only picture these two. Moss though couldve been played by someone else and Im not so sure she did a great job.<br />
Without strife, your victory has no meaning.<br />
Without strife, you do not advance.<br />
Without strife, there is only stagnation.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/226769/flashback</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 May 2026 20:52:11 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/226769.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2026 01:46:35 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl></channel></rss>