<![CDATA[How could you not have John Goodman]]>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — The Flintstones in Viva Rock Vegas

chivers677 — 15 years ago(June 20, 2010 05:56 AM)

This movie is parfetic and just simply awful, i don't know how they could make a sequel to the original without John Goodman, it looks as if it was a direct to video movie because it looks as if they couldn't afford the original cast. This looks really bad i watched a few minutes but just stopped when i found out it wasn't the original cast. Did anybody actually like this?

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/227958/how-could-you-not-have-john-goodmanRSS for NodeThu, 14 May 2026 22:37:11 GMTSun, 03 May 2026 04:53:00 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to How could you not have John Goodman on Sun, 03 May 2026 04:53:07 GMT]]>IMDb User

This message has been deleted.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1911034https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1911034Sun, 03 May 2026 04:53:07 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to How could you not have John Goodman on Sun, 03 May 2026 04:53:06 GMT]]>jazzcky — 10 years ago(September 06, 2015 11:39 AM)

What's "parfetic" is the fact that you can't spell "pathetic" correctly.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1911033https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1911033Sun, 03 May 2026 04:53:06 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to How could you not have John Goodman on Sun, 03 May 2026 04:53:05 GMT]]>arkay — 12 years ago(October 01, 2013 01:32 PM)

Rubbish. Years before this movie was made I already had pictured him as Fred Flintstone. He just totally looked the part.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1911032https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1911032Sun, 03 May 2026 04:53:05 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to How could you not have John Goodman on Sun, 03 May 2026 04:53:04 GMT]]>Irishdrummer007 — 13 years ago(September 25, 2012 09:20 AM)

Because John Goodman was not all that great as Fred. He should stick to Roseanne. Mark Addy was way bettter as fred.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1911031https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1911031Sun, 03 May 2026 04:53:04 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to How could you not have John Goodman on Sun, 03 May 2026 04:53:02 GMT]]>thirdrow — 15 years ago(March 19, 2011 06:51 PM)

I like this movie better than the first actually. This one was lighter and peppier, while the original Flintstones film seemed overproduced. The original cast (while all great actors) didn't seem like they were having a lot of fun with the material.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1911030https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1911030Sun, 03 May 2026 04:53:02 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to How could you not have John Goodman on Sun, 03 May 2026 04:53:01 GMT]]>Kynzie131 — 15 years ago(August 08, 2010 03:40 PM)

John Goodman apparently felt another movie was over kill Hence why this one is a prequel to the animated series, to make it look like the characters have aged and matured a bit..
I agree though, John Goodman was amazing as Fred! In fact the whole cast was much better in the first movie!

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1911029https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1911029Sun, 03 May 2026 04:53:01 GMT