<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Jane Krakowski in this film is without doubts but beautiful and hot small that appears.]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — The Flintstones in Viva Rock Vegas</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>arucard-leproso</strong> — <em>19 years ago(April 28, 2006 06:34 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Jane Krakowski in this film is without doubts but beautiful and hot small that appears.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/227963/jane-krakowski-in-this-film-is-without-doubts-but-beautiful-and-hot-small-that-appears</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 May 2026 19:45:50 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/227963.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2026 04:53:32 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Jane Krakowski in this film is without doubts but beautiful and hot small that appears. on Sun, 03 May 2026 04:53:43 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Wuchakk</strong> — <em>10 years ago(June 09, 2015 11:01 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Jane Krakowski in this film is without doubts but beautiful and hot<br />
The movie's worth watching just to view Jane with jaw-dropping AWE<br />
My 150 (or so) favorite movies:<br />
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/list/ls070122364/" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.imdb.com/list/ls070122364/</a></p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1911067</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1911067</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2026 04:53:43 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Jane Krakowski in this film is without doubts but beautiful and hot small that appears. on Sun, 03 May 2026 04:53:42 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>FridayOnElmStreet</strong> — <em>12 years ago(December 03, 2013 11:43 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Indeed she is!</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1911066</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1911066</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2026 04:53:42 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Jane Krakowski in this film is without doubts but beautiful and hot small that appears. on Sun, 03 May 2026 04:53:41 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>ahneonzebra60</strong> — <em>12 years ago(July 24, 2013 12:38 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">If there's one good thing I can say about this movie, it's that I did like Jane Krakowski in this. Rosie O'Donnell as Betty in the first movie was not a good choice, of course as we all know she got the part because of the laugh, otherwise she didn't really bring the character to life for me. But when I saw Jane in this movie I did think she was really pretty and how I would have wanted Betty to be seen as a real person.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1911065</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1911065</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2026 04:53:41 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Jane Krakowski in this film is without doubts but beautiful and hot small that appears. on Sun, 03 May 2026 04:53:40 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>ZeoRangerFive</strong> — <em>12 years ago(May 29, 2013 10:29 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Very agreed, WAY better than Rosie O'Donnell (though a dead monkey would be better than Rosie O'Donnell in ANYTHING) but, after watching 30 Rock I find her so damn annoying!<br />
Dragonzord! Mastodon! Pterodactyl! Triceratops! Saber Toothed Tiger! Tyrannosaurus!</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1911064</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1911064</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2026 04:53:40 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Jane Krakowski in this film is without doubts but beautiful and hot small that appears. on Sun, 03 May 2026 04:53:38 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>KristenStewartForever</strong> — <em>13 years ago(March 31, 2013 11:58 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Sexy as hell. <img src="https://filmglance.com/discuss/assets/plugins/nodebb-plugin-emoji/emoji/android/1f642.png?v=8570fb93240" class="not-responsive emoji emoji-android emoji--slightly_smiling_face" style="height:23px;width:auto;vertical-align:middle" title=":-)" alt="🙂" /> Perfect for Betty.<br />
No Day But Today. Today 4 U. One Song Glory.<br />
How we gonna pay last year's RENT?!</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1911063</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1911063</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2026 04:53:38 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Jane Krakowski in this film is without doubts but beautiful and hot small that appears. on Sun, 03 May 2026 04:53:37 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Irishdrummer007</strong> — <em>13 years ago(September 25, 2012 09:25 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Yep Barney is one lucky man lol</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1911062</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1911062</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2026 04:53:37 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Jane Krakowski in this film is without doubts but beautiful and hot small that appears. on Sun, 03 May 2026 04:53:36 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>ecavuto</strong> — <em>13 years ago(July 20, 2012 10:19 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I see a peculiar symmetry between this movie and the original. Wilma was hot while Betty was NOT. Rosie O'Donnell??? The sequel features a Betty who has showgirl legs (and everything else) while Wilma is pretty unremarkable.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1911061</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1911061</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2026 04:53:36 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Jane Krakowski in this film is without doubts but beautiful and hot small that appears. on Sun, 03 May 2026 04:53:35 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>simian_ninja</strong> — <em>13 years ago(May 02, 2012 07:27 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Hahaha, this reminds me of the time and my best friend went to see the movie twice in the cinema because we thought she was so hot. First time we were with guys, second time we went with our girlfriends and kept on giving each other nods and "I know" looks.<br />
Deftones makes the world a better place</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1911060</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1911060</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2026 04:53:35 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Jane Krakowski in this film is without doubts but beautiful and hot small that appears. on Sun, 03 May 2026 04:53:34 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>oldtiger1965</strong> — <em>19 years ago(December 19, 2006 08:00 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Since you opened this "can" I will say this much:<br />
I agree. Jane is very sexy, and she has been since she was in NL's Vacation.<br />
I think she does a  better Betty than Rosie (no disrespect to Rosie), but Jane has that same "look" and style as the cartoon character.<br />
Salvadoreo by birth. American by the Grace of God.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1911059</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1911059</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2026 04:53:34 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Jane Krakowski in this film is without doubts but beautiful and hot small that appears. on Sun, 03 May 2026 04:53:33 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>esther-eisenhauer</strong> — <em>19 years ago(June 09, 2006 04:25 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">First off, please rephrase that. Second off, if I was bi or lesbian, I would totally agree with you. lol<br />
I'm not psycho, just a little loopy<br />
<em>~Es~</em></p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1911058</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1911058</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2026 04:53:33 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>