<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[great sets + props]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — The Flintstones in Viva Rock Vegas</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>rogerhessjr</strong> — <em>16 years ago(September 07, 2009 06:04 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">the sets and props in this film were awesome and must have been very expensive. they should have made two movies at once with the same bedrock sets - would have spread out the costs. there was a lot to be explored in their lives between this movie and the original.  i thought this cast fit their parts much better than the the cast of the first movie and probably worked cheaper so a third film would not have cost that much.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/228011/great-sets-props</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 May 2026 22:40:31 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/228011.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2026 04:56:50 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl></channel></rss>