<![CDATA[Would it be better if Chuck Noland stayed on the island?]]>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Cast Away

roman2886 — 9 years ago(December 30, 2016 02:05 PM)

When Chuck Noland on the island he wanted to take his chance out there in the ocean instead,If Chiuck Noland stayed on the island would he have been better off since he stayed on the island for 4 years he was skilled fisherman he would never run of food and he was better at making fires.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/228212/would-it-be-better-if-chuck-noland-stayed-on-the-islandRSS for NodeThu, 14 May 2026 15:20:40 GMTSun, 03 May 2026 05:21:44 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to Would it be better if Chuck Noland stayed on the island? on Sun, 03 May 2026 05:21:52 GMT]]>regahsof — 9 years ago(January 30, 2017 11:53 AM)

The Red Turtle?

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1912553https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1912553Sun, 03 May 2026 05:21:52 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Would it be better if Chuck Noland stayed on the island? on Sun, 03 May 2026 05:21:51 GMT]]>McQueen1980 — 9 years ago(January 25, 2017 09:42 AM)

i dunno but i will say the movie's quality took a nosedive when he left the island
for one thing wilson would have stayed alive

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1912552https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1912552Sun, 03 May 2026 05:21:51 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Would it be better if Chuck Noland stayed on the island? on Sun, 03 May 2026 05:21:50 GMT]]>Joel_S — 9 years ago(January 17, 2017 05:11 AM)

He was likely going to die eventually alone b/c of disease or injury. It's amazing he stayed alive for 4 years. A bad infection or stomach virus can ruin some people.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1912551https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1912551Sun, 03 May 2026 05:21:50 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Would it be better if Chuck Noland stayed on the island? on Sun, 03 May 2026 05:21:49 GMT]]>goodvibe61 — 9 years ago(January 07, 2017 04:06 PM)

It's not even a choice. You've got to try to get out of there, to take the risk of having a life, ANY life, than that alternative.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1912550https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1912550Sun, 03 May 2026 05:21:49 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Would it be better if Chuck Noland stayed on the island? on Sun, 03 May 2026 05:21:47 GMT]]>jmr61 — 9 years ago(January 02, 2017 08:38 PM)

You want to live a life with no hope, a life that's VERY hard because he has to gather or kill everything he needs to survive, until you die alone with a disease or injury?
Or take a chance to save yourself?

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1912549https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1912549Sun, 03 May 2026 05:21:47 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Would it be better if Chuck Noland stayed on the island? on Sun, 03 May 2026 05:21:46 GMT]]>dr_faristuta — 9 years ago(January 02, 2017 08:27 PM)

even that friend died*

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1912548https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1912548Sun, 03 May 2026 05:21:46 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Would it be better if Chuck Noland stayed on the island? on Sun, 03 May 2026 05:21:45 GMT]]>dr_faristuta — 9 years ago(January 02, 2017 08:26 PM)

No. He was very lonely. His only friend was a volleyball and even friend died.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1912547https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1912547Sun, 03 May 2026 05:21:45 GMT