<![CDATA[Underated]]>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Jurassic Park III

ldlbs — 9 years ago(February 06, 2017 05:37 PM)

Underated

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/228437/underatedRSS for NodeTue, 12 May 2026 15:14:36 GMTSun, 03 May 2026 05:53:23 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to Underated on Sun, 03 May 2026 05:53:28 GMT]]>exithereplease — 5 months ago(October 05, 2025 08:37 PM)

Far better than 2 and JW

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1914243https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1914243Sun, 03 May 2026 05:53:28 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Underated on Sun, 03 May 2026 05:53:26 GMT]]>Chronic_Johnson — 3 years ago(April 10, 2022 12:39 AM)

I agree. 3 is a really fun movie, despite its problems. The only Jurassic Park movies I like, and that I can go back to are 1 and 3.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1914242https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1914242Sun, 03 May 2026 05:53:26 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Underated on Sun, 03 May 2026 05:53:25 GMT]]>preachcaleb — 4 years ago(March 08, 2022 08:09 PM)

Can't really say that. They're about equal for me.
So many stories, so little time.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1914241https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1914241Sun, 03 May 2026 05:53:25 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Underated on Sun, 03 May 2026 05:53:24 GMT]]>Captain_Wesker — 9 years ago(February 10, 2017 02:06 AM)

Absolutely!
It is a tale told by an idiot, full of sound and fury, signifying nothing
.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1914240https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1914240Sun, 03 May 2026 05:53:24 GMT