<![CDATA[A sequel that just didn't need to be made.]]>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Jurassic Park III

foxhound-37781 — 9 years ago(August 15, 2016 08:24 PM)

It's just a popcorn flick designed for an hour and a half of mindless entertainment.
pathetic, almost non existent storyline. you dont care who dies because there's no character development, Eric lasting eight weeks all by himself? give me a break.
The raptors look stupid, the kirby's are the most annoying parents in the history of film. The only thing that helps me give this movie a 3 out of ten is the fact that Sam Neill is in it.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/228460/a-sequel-that-just-didn-t-need-to-be-madeRSS for NodeTue, 12 May 2026 18:59:40 GMTSun, 03 May 2026 05:56:49 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to A sequel that just didn't need to be made. on Sun, 03 May 2026 05:57:00 GMT]]>Full_Blooded_Italian — 9 years ago(February 04, 2017 12:41 PM)

I felt tha f way about tlw.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1914423https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1914423Sun, 03 May 2026 05:57:00 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to A sequel that just didn't need to be made. on Sun, 03 May 2026 05:56:58 GMT]]>T-eschberger — 9 years ago(November 06, 2016 06:54 AM)

Pretty much. Look up the definition of "pointless sequel" and JP3 is referenced. Even the Transformers sequels feel more justified in existing. At least they add crap to their mythology. JP3 fails in every single aspect. It can't even fabricate a believable way to get Grant back to the island.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1914422https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1914422Sun, 03 May 2026 05:56:58 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to A sequel that just didn't need to be made. on Sun, 03 May 2026 05:56:57 GMT]]>IMDb User

This message has been deleted.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1914421https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1914421Sun, 03 May 2026 05:56:57 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to A sequel that just didn't need to be made. on Sun, 03 May 2026 05:56:56 GMT]]>asdtw — 9 years ago(August 22, 2016 06:49 AM)

This page's poster is unclear
But I don't have the competence to change it
Who can change it into a clearer one ? THX

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1914420https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1914420Sun, 03 May 2026 05:56:56 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to A sequel that just didn't need to be made. on Sun, 03 May 2026 05:56:55 GMT]]>Captain_Wesker — 9 years ago(September 25, 2016 10:54 PM)

Ayup. I too enjoyed it for what it was.
It is a tale told by an idiot, full of sound and fury, signifying nothing
.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1914419https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1914419Sun, 03 May 2026 05:56:55 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to A sequel that just didn't need to be made. on Sun, 03 May 2026 05:56:53 GMT]]>IMDb User

This message has been deleted.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1914418https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1914418Sun, 03 May 2026 05:56:53 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to A sequel that just didn't need to be made. on Sun, 03 May 2026 05:56:52 GMT]]>Decomposed — 9 years ago(August 22, 2016 04:12 AM)

The Lost World has its own set of problems (forced environmentalist messages, comedic one-liners that fall flat, the "good" guys are actually responsible for almost every death on the film etc), but it's still miles better than JP3.
JP3 is actually one of the most annoying, needless and disappointing sequels ever filmed.
Jurassic World is better than both TLW and JP3 imo, but I still gave it a 7/10, because it has problems too.
Ultimately, nothing can reach the original movie which will always be considered a classic.
For within each death there is always a new life, a new beginning - Dillon, Alien 3

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1914417https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1914417Sun, 03 May 2026 05:56:52 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to A sequel that just didn't need to be made. on Sun, 03 May 2026 05:56:51 GMT]]>foxhound-37781 — 9 years ago(August 16, 2016 10:43 PM)

Yeah I couldn't help but feel Jurassic World is the only worthy sequel as it's the only real direct sequel to the first. The Lost World is made out to be a direct sequel but I couldn't help but feel it's more of a spinoff than what it is a sequel

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1914416https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1914416Sun, 03 May 2026 05:56:51 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to A sequel that just didn't need to be made. on Sun, 03 May 2026 05:56:50 GMT]]>Decomposed — 9 years ago(August 16, 2016 03:13 AM)

Yeah, I gave it a 3/10 too.
For within each death there is always a new life, a new beginning - Dillon, Alien 3

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1914415https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1914415Sun, 03 May 2026 05:56:50 GMT