<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[It is not rocket science people!]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Under Suspicion</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>dannyvazmon1</strong> — <em>9 years ago(December 05, 2016 10:29 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">They specifically mention in the movie that the killer was "caught in the act". They found an entire album of pictures of the previous victims in his car. How can people still debate on "who the real killer" was? How much more evidence do you need? It is practically spoon-fed to us.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/228771/it-is-not-rocket-science-people</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 May 2026 04:31:12 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/228771.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2026 06:45:15 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl></channel></rss>