<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[serieously this was an entertaining film. I think that this how procedurals should be done. He needs to be very emersive]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Under Suspicion</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>taxidriver8989</strong> — <em>14 years ago(May 25, 2011 05:43 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">serieously this was an entertaining film. I think that this how procedurals should be done. He needs to be very emersive experience. For  came I think procedural stop being innovative around the time that Boomtown was canceled. Why can't the viewer have a more complex case to solve on their own.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/228813/serieously-this-was-an-entertaining-film-i-think-that-this-how-procedurals-should-be-done-he-needs-to-be-very-emersive</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 May 2026 03:52:34 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/228813.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2026 06:51:28 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl></channel></rss>