<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[It took me a while to get round to seeing this film. I&#x27;ve tried before in the past and it always came off as a little du]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Gladiator</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>BrickNash</strong> — <em>9 years ago(January 01, 2017 12:01 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">It took me a while to get round to seeing this film. I've tried before in the past and it always came off as a little dull but I stuck with it this time.<br />
Yes it's quite good and the cast are brilliant but I'd say it loses momentum from time to time and about half an hour out from the end I sort of lost interest. It's nice to look at as well but for Ridley Scott standards it's a little sub par.<br />
Apparently the script was unfinished and went through extensive re-writes during production and it's sort of shows as it's one of the weaker points of the film.<br />
I'm glad I saw it though and it is good but just a little clunky in parts and not very memorable past the charisma of the wonderful actors and Scott's hand.<br />
Not sure I'd watch it again but I can't fault what is a great effort by talented people.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/229394/it-took-me-a-while-to-get-round-to-seeing-this-film-i-ve-tried-before-in-the-past-and-it-always-came-off-as-a-little-du</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Sun, 17 May 2026 13:18:16 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/229394.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2026 08:13:58 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl></channel></rss>