<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Cinematography is surprisingly decent in this one]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Children of the Corn 666: Isaac's Return</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>GoodRed</strong> — <em>10 years ago(November 01, 2015 10:30 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I know what I'm getting into when I watch a COTC flick: gore, future stars (when they're still green as hell), weird plots that border on the nonsensical, crap special effects, and overall campy fun. But I just watched this one on Netflix for the first time in many years, and I've only just now noticed how striking the actual cinematography is in this one. Most of everything else is crap as usual, but it at least LOOKED good! Surprisingly so.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/229439/cinematography-is-surprisingly-decent-in-this-one</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 May 2026 18:02:17 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/229439.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2026 08:18:58 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl></channel></rss>