<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[The movie sure ain&#x27;t on my top 10 sci fi films, but man, 2.4?!? it aint that movie.  I enjoyed it; it deserves at least]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Battlefield Earth</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>gabypanama</strong> — <em>9 years ago(September 19, 2016 11:53 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">The movie sure ain't on my top 10 sci fi films, but man, 2.4?!? it aint that movie.  I enjoyed it; it deserves at least a 5.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/229819/the-movie-sure-ain-t-on-my-top-10-sci-fi-films-but-man-2-4-it-aint-that-movie-i-enjoyed-it-it-deserves-at-least</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Sun, 17 May 2026 15:55:42 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/229819.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2026 09:22:39 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to The movie sure ain&#x27;t on my top 10 sci fi films, but man, 2.4?!? it aint that movie.  I enjoyed it; it deserves at least on Sun, 03 May 2026 09:22:43 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>cooper-123</strong> — <em>9 years ago(December 15, 2016 05:05 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I can't believe anyone could take this movie as anything but a bizarre rant from the "church" of Scientology.<br />
It was fun in the sense of its ridiculousness.<br />
Camped up to the hilt.<br />
Really loved the platforms those Psyclos sported.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1925266</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1925266</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2026 09:22:43 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to The movie sure ain&#x27;t on my top 10 sci fi films, but man, 2.4?!? it aint that movie.  I enjoyed it; it deserves at least on Sun, 03 May 2026 09:22:42 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Mad_Monkey</strong> — <em>9 years ago(December 09, 2016 02:45 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">2.4 is really unfair it should be 1.1.<br />
This really was a bad movie. Poorly written and bad acting.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1925265</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1925265</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2026 09:22:42 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to The movie sure ain&#x27;t on my top 10 sci fi films, but man, 2.4?!? it aint that movie.  I enjoyed it; it deserves at least on Sun, 03 May 2026 09:22:41 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>stewartgrove</strong> — <em>9 years ago(December 05, 2016 04:38 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I agree. 5 out of 10 is fair. I may even go as i high as 6 but I've not read the book</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1925264</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1925264</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2026 09:22:41 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>