<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[so much better than the original urban legend from 1998]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Urban Legends: Final Cut</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>lukejbarnett</strong> — <em>3 years ago(January 21, 2023 05:37 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">a very rare example of the sequel is better than the original film.<br />
the first film is boring. this film is entertaining and quite fun and rewatchable.<br />
lukejbarnett</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/230348/so-much-better-than-the-original-urban-legend-from-1998</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 May 2026 19:09:47 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/230348.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2026 10:57:25 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to so much better than the original urban legend from 1998 on Sun, 03 May 2026 10:57:26 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>ranc1</strong> — <em>3 years ago(February 09, 2023 10:33 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I love them both. Sequel was amazing with the mine scene.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1930284</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1930284</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2026 10:57:26 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>