<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Claudia Winkleman presumably busy elsewhere?  That&#x27;s a plus.]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Film '72</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>stemal-1</strong> — <em>9 years ago(November 02, 2016 06:24 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Claudia Winkleman presumably busy elsewhere?  That's a plus.<br />
So in comes Zoe Ball to occupy the chair.  I know the Beeb have got to get value for money from their big earners, and to be fair Zoe is slightly less annoying than Claudia.<br />
But this is another nail in the coffin for a 45 year old programme that has gradually descended into something that is hard to watch.<br />
Danny Leigh as ever is the only reason to watch.  I'd have him, Antonia Quirke and Mark Kermode as the permanent team in a move to a more serious film review/discussion show.<br />
The Beeb long ago shunted it to a late night slot so it can't be worried about audience figures.  Can we please try a proper terrestrial channel film programme now?</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/230446/claudia-winkleman-presumably-busy-elsewhere-that-s-a-plus</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 May 2026 16:08:28 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/230446.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2026 11:09:05 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl></channel></rss>