<![CDATA[6.7??]]>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Hannibal

graulaw — 11 years ago(June 27, 2014 03:41 PM)

It amazed me just how low this work of art is appreciated.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/231189/6-7RSS for NodeTue, 12 May 2026 16:10:43 GMTSun, 03 May 2026 12:46:03 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to 6.7?? on Sun, 03 May 2026 12:46:12 GMT]]>yusef-ghanima — 10 years ago(April 07, 2015 03:28 PM)

before or after your brain white trash meal?
i mostly will not be able to answer your reply, since marissa mayer hacked my email, no notification

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1936037https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1936037Sun, 03 May 2026 12:46:12 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to 6.7?? on Sun, 03 May 2026 12:46:11 GMT]]>britten_mark — 9 years ago(August 25, 2016 05:06 PM)

A 9 from me, only marred sligtly by some occasinal kitsch camera work and over used bookmarks, like the cuts to news footage of the latest current events, which I doubt would happen on a secretive investigation anyway.
"Well, let's not start suckin' each others dicks just yet"

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1936036https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1936036Sun, 03 May 2026 12:46:11 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to 6.7?? on Sun, 03 May 2026 12:46:09 GMT]]>shawnz1028 — 11 years ago(April 03, 2015 08:17 PM)

It was a solid followup to Lambs, but I'd still only give it a 7/10, which isn't all that much higher than 6.7. Still, it makes my personal top-250.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1936035https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1936035Sun, 03 May 2026 12:46:09 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to 6.7?? on Sun, 03 May 2026 12:46:08 GMT]]>IMDb User

This message has been deleted.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1936034https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1936034Sun, 03 May 2026 12:46:08 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to 6.7?? on Sun, 03 May 2026 12:46:07 GMT]]>Dark_Phoenix89 — 11 years ago(January 15, 2015 06:10 PM)

Agreed; Its a solid 8/10 from me 🙂
"Speak of the Devil, and He shall appear."

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1936033https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1936033Sun, 03 May 2026 12:46:07 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to 6.7?? on Sun, 03 May 2026 12:46:06 GMT]]>KDBoa — 11 years ago(July 15, 2014 02:17 AM)

Thanks for the heads up

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1936032https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1936032Sun, 03 May 2026 12:46:06 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to 6.7?? on Sun, 03 May 2026 12:46:05 GMT]]>IMDb User

This message has been deleted.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1936031https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1936031Sun, 03 May 2026 12:46:05 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to 6.7?? on Sun, 03 May 2026 12:46:04 GMT]]>KDBoa — 11 years ago(July 14, 2014 08:52 AM)

Agreed.
However, I remember being disappointed when I first saw this at the cinemas. A year or so later i read the book then went back and saw the film again. What Scott has done here is amazing. I wish the subplot of the other serial killer in the art gallery was given a bit more attention.
I'm thinking of getting it on blu-ray. Just checking what different versions are out there

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1936030https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1936030Sun, 03 May 2026 12:46:04 GMT