<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Angel Eyes ~ YUCHHH…]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Angel Eyes</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>guyinnanaimo</strong> — <em>14 years ago(June 18, 2011 11:05 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Lopez' acting skill in this one is about a -2 on a 1-10 scaleshe's terrible.<br />
And Caviezel's character switches from being a scary stalker, to a smiling nice guy, to whateverhe's awful in this dud, too.<br />
It's a '2' out of 10 overall, movie-wise, at best.<br />
Don't bother.<br />
'You can't HANDLE the truth!'</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/231365/angel-eyes-yuchhh</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 May 2026 16:08:17 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/231365.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2026 13:08:29 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl></channel></rss>