<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[I&#x27;m sort of glad I don&#x27;t have to look at Jess&#x27; nasty tattoo anymore]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Survivor</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>MasterMoron</strong> — <em>9 years ago(November 23, 2016 08:25 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">It sucks that Jess is gone since it will hurt David's game since he now only has three other people in his alliance, but it will be nice to not have to look at Jess' nasty tattoo each week.  Seriously, why do women do that to themselves?  Jess actually looks like she had a pretty nice body.  But, she decides to destroy it by covering herself in ink.  Disgusting.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/231927/i-m-sort-of-glad-i-don-t-have-to-look-at-jess-nasty-tattoo-anymore</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 May 2026 23:29:29 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/231927.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2026 14:22:42 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to I&#x27;m sort of glad I don&#x27;t have to look at Jess&#x27; nasty tattoo anymore on Sun, 03 May 2026 14:22:51 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>larosat</strong> — <em>9 years ago(November 23, 2016 11:53 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Hannah looks like she's constantly bombarded by ash from a Volcano.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1941120</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1941120</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2026 14:22:51 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to I&#x27;m sort of glad I don&#x27;t have to look at Jess&#x27; nasty tattoo anymore on Sun, 03 May 2026 14:22:50 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Loodgookin</strong> — <em>9 years ago(November 23, 2016 10:55 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I'd rather not look at Hannah's debris filled teeth than some ink.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1941119</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1941119</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2026 14:22:50 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to I&#x27;m sort of glad I don&#x27;t have to look at Jess&#x27; nasty tattoo anymore on Sun, 03 May 2026 14:22:48 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>nathanp-96006</strong> — <em>9 years ago(November 24, 2016 06:16 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I would agree with you but in this case, most of her ink is on a part of her body that she pretty much never sees without serious effort or a lot of mirrors. So not so sure she did it for herself as much as to show the world. Kind of like a tramp stamp, those tattoos aren't there for you to look at but for the person taking you from behind to look at.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1941118</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1941118</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2026 14:22:48 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to I&#x27;m sort of glad I don&#x27;t have to look at Jess&#x27; nasty tattoo anymore on Sun, 03 May 2026 14:22:47 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>legendkillinpeopleschamp</strong> — <em>9 years ago(November 23, 2016 10:46 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Wow you are quite the stupid one.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1941117</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1941117</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2026 14:22:47 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to I&#x27;m sort of glad I don&#x27;t have to look at Jess&#x27; nasty tattoo anymore on Sun, 03 May 2026 14:22:46 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Spittinlmage</strong> — <em>9 years ago(November 23, 2016 10:43 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Spoken like a true Third Wave Feminist. How is it a 'good thing' that women get hideous blots on their bodies exactly? What 'good' does that ensue? It does nothing for women. At all. This isn't even a woman issue. Tattoos are stupid in general, on men OR women. They will not boost you in any way as a gender or sex. This isn't a matter of rights or 'thinking for yourself,' this is a matter of ugly things looking ugly. Nothing more. No one cares about what you want or what you like. Don't expect to be hired for any job you apply to or be accepted into any club you share common interests in. Don't expect to be treated the same as people who aren't retarded enough to mutilate their bodies when being pulled over, ordering at a restaurant or dropping your kids off at school. This isn't about dating men or men. This is about being held accountable for your (retarded) actions and (wo)manning up when it comes to looking like a carnival attraction. At the end of the day, you WILL be looked at differently and judged accordingly. Accept it, live with it and move on.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1941116</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1941116</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2026 14:22:46 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to I&#x27;m sort of glad I don&#x27;t have to look at Jess&#x27; nasty tattoo anymore on Sun, 03 May 2026 14:22:45 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>larosat</strong> — <em>9 years ago(November 23, 2016 09:55 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Except it doesn't look classy on a woman. What  do you think tramp stamp means when has a tattoo on her lower back? She certainly has a right to do whatever she wants with her body but women are immediately judged when they have tattoos. Especially excessive ones and they will certainly attract undesirable attention; unless of course that's what she desires.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1941115</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1941115</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2026 14:22:45 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to I&#x27;m sort of glad I don&#x27;t have to look at Jess&#x27; nasty tattoo anymore on Sun, 03 May 2026 14:22:44 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Jesusfreak4ever</strong> — <em>9 years ago(November 23, 2016 09:34 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Well it's a good thing that women can think for themselves and don't have to cave to the wants or desires of a man. Especially one who has aptly dubbed himself "MasterMoron." She wanted art on her body. That's her prerogative. You don't like it? Great. She didn't do it for anyone else. Date someone who doesn't have ink. But don't label and defame those who do.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1941114</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1941114</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2026 14:22:44 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>