<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Social accuracy]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — The Four Feathers</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>d-phillipson-446-481929</strong> — <em>13 years ago(September 23, 2012 07:34 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">The main contrast with the 1939 Korda film is that that got the social environment right and the Hollywood film badly wrong, e.g.</p>
<ol>
<li>The regiment's "shipping out" = US 20th century usage.</li>
<li>Hero Harry appears in London in civilian clothes first wearing a cloth cap (worn by gentlemen only for hiking or shooting sports, never "in town,") secondly hatless.  No gentlemsn ever appeared hatless in public.</li>
<li>The desert march shows officers on camels (OK) armed with rifles (wrong.)  Rifles were rankers weapons;  officers carried only pistols and sword.</li>
<li>In Egypt, the army buys materials with paper currency.  It should have been gold coin.</li>
<li>After the disaster, an officer in uniform addresses a public meeting about government policy.  This was strictly forbidden (and officers did not wear uniform when in civilian society.)<br />
The general point is that Victorian army officers followed a strict code of behavior that governed what they did.   This is what the story The Four Feathers is about.  The Hollywood version ignored or obscured this.</li>
</ol>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/231996/social-accuracy</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 May 2026 17:35:49 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/231996.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2026 14:31:41 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Social accuracy on Sun, 03 May 2026 14:31:43 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>ccorraliza</strong> — <em>11 years ago(December 28, 2014 06:30 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Officer could use a long gun. Burnaby has a hunting shotgun in the actual canpaign.<br />
I believe some British officers used carbines when in the mounted rifleman role in the Zulu War. Hlobane comes to mind.<br />
But yes I thought it was unusual as well. Mounted rifleman column I thought.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1941585</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1941585</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2026 14:31:43 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Social accuracy on Sun, 03 May 2026 14:31:42 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Ridgeback08</strong> — <em>12 years ago(November 01, 2013 11:42 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">You sir, are correct</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1941584</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1941584</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2026 14:31:42 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>