<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[I think Paramount should&#x27;ve released the original R-rated cut on DVD instead of the theatrical PG-13 cut. It&#x27;s not like]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — The Four Feathers</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>Roger_Kint</strong> — <em>23 years ago(December 14, 2002 02:08 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I think Paramount should've released the original R-rated cut on DVD instead of the theatrical PG-13 cut. It's not like it would've hurt the sales.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/232013/i-think-paramount-should-ve-released-the-original-r-rated-cut-on-dvd-instead-of-the-theatrical-pg-13-cut-it-s-not-like</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 May 2026 17:57:57 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/232013.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2026 14:32:40 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to I think Paramount should&#x27;ve released the original R-rated cut on DVD instead of the theatrical PG-13 cut. It&#x27;s not like on Sun, 03 May 2026 14:32:41 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>nutsberryfarm</strong> — <em>13 years ago(March 13, 2013 03:56 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">good idea.<br />
You stay classy, San Diego.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1941636</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1941636</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2026 14:32:41 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>