<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Very good film but 1939 version by Korda was better]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — The Four Feathers</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>elaineart</strong> — <em>14 years ago(July 12, 2011 07:34 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Korda's film released in 1939 is the superior film - beautiful color photography<br />
and excellent action, truly a great film.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/232029/very-good-film-but-1939-version-by-korda-was-better</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 May 2026 16:43:16 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/232029.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2026 14:36:24 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Very good film but 1939 version by Korda was better on Sun, 03 May 2026 14:36:25 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>mam13143</strong> — <em>13 years ago(June 09, 2012 03:54 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Couldn't agree with you more. Excellent acting and not overblown like the new one. Korda did a much better job. And they totally forgot about the "fuzzi-wuzzies" and the big attack against the british line. Sometimes different isn't better, or in other words, you cant remake a classic!</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1941837</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1941837</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2026 14:36:25 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>