<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Butterfaces?]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Y Tu Mamá También</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>GuyOnTheLeft</strong> — <em>13 years ago(November 04, 2012 02:04 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I thought the central female character, as well as at least one of the boys' girlfriends (the one who claimed to have lost her passport), had nice bodies but fairly unattractive faces (although from certain angles the main character looked kind of attractive at times).  Was this how other people saw it?  Is this how the filmmaker intended the audience to see it or is it just me?  It kind of impacts a bit on how to interpret the film to some degree.<br />
See a list of my favourite films here: <a href="http://www.flickchart.com/slackerinc" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.flickchart.com/slackerinc</a></p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/232194/butterfaces</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 May 2026 18:03:59 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/232194.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2026 14:57:10 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Butterfaces? on Sun, 03 May 2026 14:57:15 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>ramcamcole</strong> — <em>11 years ago(March 04, 2015 06:35 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">She's not a ten or anything but she has a nice face</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1942929</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1942929</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2026 14:57:15 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Butterfaces? on Sun, 03 May 2026 14:57:14 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>BaconLettuceTomato</strong> — <em>13 years ago(January 04, 2013 11:02 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto"><em>prettier &amp; more feminine</em></p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1942928</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1942928</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2026 14:57:14 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Butterfaces? on Sun, 03 May 2026 14:57:13 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>schall1991</strong> — <em>9 years ago(January 04, 2017 01:34 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Could have been the teeth. That woman could eat an apple through a picket fence.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1942927</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1942927</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2026 14:57:13 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Butterfaces? on Sun, 03 May 2026 14:57:12 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>BaconLettuceTomato</strong> — <em>13 years ago(January 04, 2013 11:01 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">she could have been more pretty &amp; feminineshe lacked something in her facecan't place it exactly, bc she wasn't ugly or completely unattractive. hmmm.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1942926</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1942926</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2026 14:57:12 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>