<![CDATA[Oh my, the CGI.]]>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Die Another Day

just_for_movies — 10 years ago(August 27, 2015 06:21 PM)

it was awful. Especially during the surfing scene near the end.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/232310/oh-my-the-cgiRSS for NodeWed, 13 May 2026 12:31:21 GMTSun, 03 May 2026 15:19:44 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to Oh my, the CGI. on Sun, 03 May 2026 15:19:53 GMT]]>lawrenceconwayvulcan — 9 years ago(December 08, 2016 11:46 AM)

It is no worse than mountain avalanche boarding in XXX.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1944096https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1944096Sun, 03 May 2026 15:19:53 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Oh my, the CGI. on Sun, 03 May 2026 15:19:52 GMT]]>benaven — 9 years ago(December 01, 2016 11:39 PM)

That kite surfing scene towards the end was just embarrassing; how on earth did that get the green light?

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1944095https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1944095Sun, 03 May 2026 15:19:52 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Oh my, the CGI. on Sun, 03 May 2026 15:19:51 GMT]]>Suntory_Times — 10 years ago(February 03, 2016 01:37 AM)

Honestly we where not able to do much better back then. However it is very poorly integrated and feels completely unnecessary which increases my and I would think many others issue with it.
Film Reverie: http://filmreverie.blogspot.com.au/
My film diary: http://letterboxd.com/filmreverie/

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1944094https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1944094Sun, 03 May 2026 15:19:51 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Oh my, the CGI. on Sun, 03 May 2026 15:19:50 GMT]]>Stef_antique — 10 years ago(January 13, 2016 01:38 AM)

I agree, it stands out like a sore thumb in a bad way!

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1944093https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1944093Sun, 03 May 2026 15:19:50 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Oh my, the CGI. on Sun, 03 May 2026 15:19:48 GMT]]>vestdennis — 10 years ago(December 18, 2015 09:22 AM)

This film should be destroyed and never mentioned again. It tarnishes the franchise.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1944092https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1944092Sun, 03 May 2026 15:19:48 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Oh my, the CGI. on Sun, 03 May 2026 15:19:47 GMT]]>FridayOnElmStreet — 10 years ago(August 31, 2015 08:45 PM)

I love the film but the CGI is rather poor.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1944091https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1944091Sun, 03 May 2026 15:19:47 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Oh my, the CGI. on Sun, 03 May 2026 15:19:46 GMT]]>This_dood — 10 years ago(September 21, 2015 01:36 AM)

The directing is bad, the scene cinematography is bad. The music is terrible. The acting is cheesy.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1944090https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1944090Sun, 03 May 2026 15:19:46 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Oh my, the CGI. on Sun, 03 May 2026 15:19:45 GMT]]>Fluke_Skywalker — 10 years ago(August 29, 2015 04:46 AM)

Before I re-watched it yesterday I read a lot of comments on how poor the f/x were, but that moment was the clincher. Even by 2002 standards that was embarrassingly bad.

A journey into the realm of the obscure:
http://saturdayshowcase.blogspot.com/

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1944089https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1944089Sun, 03 May 2026 15:19:45 GMT