<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[cost 60 million they hardly made half of it back. that is not good at all]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Dragonfly</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>Klovemovies</strong> — <em>19 years ago(February 18, 2007 07:14 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">cost 60 million they hardly made half of it back. that is not good at all</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/233143/cost-60-million-they-hardly-made-half-of-it-back-that-is-not-good-at-all</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 May 2026 23:09:41 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/233143.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2026 17:42:16 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to cost 60 million they hardly made half of it back. that is not good at all on Sun, 03 May 2026 17:42:17 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Prismark10</strong> — <em>9 years ago(May 25, 2016 04:00 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Costner by this time was not big box office.<br />
It's that man again!!</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1951471</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1951471</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2026 17:42:17 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>