<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[No 91 on Times Top 100 FIlms of the Noughties]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Lantana</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>tompb9</strong> — <em>16 years ago(February 18, 2010 12:31 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">My girlfriend and I are watching through all the top 100 films of the noughties published by The Times and this popped up at number 91.<br />
Great film!  Its been the best we've watched so far.  There's been a few others with multiple stories that overlap (Crash, Amores Perros) but this was the best in my opinion.<br />
If you're interested, you can keep up to date with our progress on the blog at:<br />
<a href="http://tomtierna.wordpress.com/" rel="nofollow ugc">http://tomtierna.wordpress.com/</a><br />
Can't say I really agree with The Times' list, see it at:<br />
<a href="http://entertainment.timesonline.co.uk/tol/arts_and_entertainment/film/article6902642.ece" rel="nofollow ugc">http://entertainment.timesonline.co.uk/tol/arts_and_entertainment/film/article6902642.ece</a></p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/233303/no-91-on-times-top-100-films-of-the-noughties</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 May 2026 07:34:33 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/233303.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2026 18:08:19 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl></channel></rss>