<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[hmmmnm let me see now:]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Don't Say a Word</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>guyinnanaimo</strong> — <em>14 years ago(September 30, 2011 07:54 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">hmmmnm let me see now:<br />
Douglas plays another wealthy {actually over-the hill} New York professional with a much younger, attractive wife and an annoying little girl, living in a exquisite apartment in the city and thrown into a 'thriller' where he must solve something quickly.<br />
Sound familiar?<br />
There's so many plot holes in this one, it would take 6 or more giant graders to fill up.<br />
How can the bad guys spend thousands of dollars on video cameras to watch Douglas' every move, and after years of 'not saying a word', Murphy finally spillspreposterous.<br />
And then throw in an attractive lady detective just to spice things up.<br />
The only good thing about this was Murphy's performancemaybe a '6'.<br />
All in all, this is a '3' using my 'scales', and I'm being kind.<br />
'You can't HANDLE the truth!'</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/233547/hmmmnm-let-me-see-now</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 May 2026 16:10:52 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/233547.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2026 18:39:59 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to hmmmnm let me see now: on Sun, 03 May 2026 18:40:02 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Susan_1980</strong> — <em>12 years ago(November 11, 2013 05:05 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">It was a decent film and held my interest.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1954385</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1954385</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2026 18:40:02 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to hmmmnm let me see now: on Sun, 03 May 2026 18:40:01 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>jharmon64</strong> — <em>14 years ago(March 07, 2012 10:02 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Familiar plot for sure.<br />
But a solid film over all.<br />
If you're paying attention, there are not many plot holes.<br />
Of course there are some, just like most any film.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1954384</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1954384</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2026 18:40:01 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>