<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[The stone is referenced as a diamond not a ruby.  I suppose the colour of it would make it so valuable as neither a norm]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Don't Say a Word</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>Drumcheeny</strong> — <em>13 years ago(April 08, 2012 05:59 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">The stone is referenced as a diamond not a ruby.  I suppose the colour of it would make it so valuable as neither a normal diamond or normal ruby would fetch that much.<br />
You must be here to fix the cable</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/233562/the-stone-is-referenced-as-a-diamond-not-a-ruby-i-suppose-the-colour-of-it-would-make-it-so-valuable-as-neither-a-norm</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 May 2026 04:24:08 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/233562.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2026 18:43:14 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to The stone is referenced as a diamond not a ruby.  I suppose the colour of it would make it so valuable as neither a norm on Sun, 03 May 2026 18:43:17 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Zuider_Zee</strong> — <em>13 years ago(June 18, 2012 06:20 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">The film was mindless crap but I salute your analysis.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1954555</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1954555</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2026 18:43:17 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to The stone is referenced as a diamond not a ruby.  I suppose the colour of it would make it so valuable as neither a norm on Sun, 03 May 2026 18:43:16 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>WileyDairyGnome</strong> — <em>14 years ago(October 24, 2011 09:00 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I call this an "eating movie". It's type of movie that I watch while I'm eating breakfast, or a snackor when I'm bored as hell.<br />
I am a traveler of both time and space, to be where I have been</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1954554</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1954554</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2026 18:43:16 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to The stone is referenced as a diamond not a ruby.  I suppose the colour of it would make it so valuable as neither a norm on Sun, 03 May 2026 18:43:15 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Drumcheeny</strong> — <em>13 years ago(April 20, 2012 01:48 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I did enjoy this film but have realised an even bigger plot hole.  It would be a matter of public record they could check - they had the John Doe name and the date of death and even potentially the date and approximate area of burial.  I think it would be very easy to check which grave he was in - this would be held by local government.<br />
Or they could even break in.  Surely easier than the plan in the film.<br />
You must be here to fix the cable</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1954553</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1954553</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2026 18:43:15 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>