<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Jess and Jules as lesbian lovers?]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Bend It Like Beckham</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>charlotte_goldenblatt</strong> — <em>13 years ago(November 28, 2012 11:41 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Just read that in the trivia section, says that was the intended ending but too controversial. Ummmm how would that even work when joe is in the picture and he plays a big role between these two girls' friendship?</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/234925/jess-and-jules-as-lesbian-lovers</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 May 2026 16:29:58 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/234925.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2026 22:33:48 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Jess and Jules as lesbian lovers? on Sun, 03 May 2026 22:33:54 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>nephihaha</strong> — <em>12 years ago(February 08, 2014 10:15 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Yes, this is true. The writer or director (forget which) said in a conference that she'd intended for them to become gay lovers, but dropped it because of the controversy it would cause.<br />
She also thought it would kill interest in the Sikh/South Asian community, whereas she wanted to make a point about women's role in that society.<br />
If that had happened, this would be yet another film better known for gratuitous girl-on-girl action than the rest of its storyline. And would probably have a longer sales life amongst any men who fancied Keira Knightley!<br />
It's not "Sci-Fi", it's SF!<br />
"Calvinism is a very liberal religious ethos." - Truekiwijoker</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1966452</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1966452</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2026 22:33:54 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Jess and Jules as lesbian lovers? on Sun, 03 May 2026 22:33:53 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>hppg</strong> — <em>12 years ago(February 14, 2014 09:17 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">YeahI don't think it would have worked quite as well. Probably would have been too much for some people to handle. And added in too many "unusual" things at once. They certainly addressed the issue of cultural barriers to being your homosexual self with the Tony subplot.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1966451</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1966451</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2026 22:33:53 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Jess and Jules as lesbian lovers? on Sun, 03 May 2026 22:33:52 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>nephihaha</strong> — <em>12 years ago(February 08, 2014 10:20 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Yes it is for real. It was difficult enough for traditional English Asians to stomach an interracial relationship, let alone a homosexual one. And the aspect of her playing football was controversial enough.<br />
I don't know what the female equivalent of a "beard" is, but that's what the male love interest is here.<br />
Personally I think it would have completely changed the market, and excluded its target audience.<br />
It's not "Sci-Fi", it's SF!<br />
"Calvinism is a very liberal religious ethos." - Truekiwijoker</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1966450</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1966450</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2026 22:33:52 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Jess and Jules as lesbian lovers? on Sun, 03 May 2026 22:33:51 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>hppg</strong> — <em>12 years ago(December 27, 2013 03:55 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Is that for real?<br />
I thought the whole point was that soccer does not make you a lesbian. And if it did, what's the harm?<br />
If that really was the original ending it must have involved signifiant rewrites! Lots of the plot was about Jules's Mum trying to be supportive but being secretly upset lol and her dad not caring<br />
And the subplot with the gay Indian friend</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1966449</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1966449</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2026 22:33:51 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Jess and Jules as lesbian lovers? on Sun, 03 May 2026 22:33:50 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>DarrinT</strong> — <em>13 years ago(March 23, 2013 03:30 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">In the original script, Joe was a gruff, middle-aged Scotsman- based on Alex Ferguson!<br />
Eventually it developed into a traditional (more commercial) love triangle rom-com.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1966448</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1966448</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2026 22:33:50 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Jess and Jules as lesbian lovers? on Sun, 03 May 2026 22:33:49 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>knkg</strong> — <em>13 years ago(December 13, 2012 12:41 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">It works because obviously the script that had the leads as lovers isn't the script that was filmed?</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1966447</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1966447</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2026 22:33:49 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>