<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Amanda and Crack]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — What a Girl Wants</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>mrtransworld</strong> — <em>12 years ago(December 25, 2013 05:31 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">And by crack and mean her ass and by that I mean it seems that either the director really likes her bottom or she needs a pan and a zoom a dedicated B crew for her entire rump. Most of the goddamn movie we get a full look at her <em>beep</em> like it's the holy grail or something. I mean, yes, it's nice, but could we trade taint for script? I think Amanda's butt got billing in the credits. If there were a sequel they would've probably done a POV from the ass perspective. In 3D. <em>beep</em><br />
Also, Colin Firth squirming like an idiot in front of a mirror in leather pants was just awkward up to lethal levels. At least they didn't concentrate on his assless ass.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/235017/amanda-and-crack</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 May 2026 16:09:27 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/235017.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2026 22:49:02 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl></channel></rss>